Bowman J.T.C.C.: — These appeals from assessments for 1988 and 1989 involve a question of the deductibility of $3,688.52 and $27,915.46 in interest on a loan of $300,000.00. In brief the appellant contends that the borrowed money was used to

Bowman J.T.C.C.: — These appeals are from assessments for the 1989, 1990 and 1991 taxation years. They involve the deductibility of losses sustained by the appellant in respect of a single family dwelling in Tucson, Arizona. The principal basis of

Bowman J.T.C.C.: — These appeals were heard together on common evidence. They relate to assessments made under the Income Tax Act for the taxation years 1990, 1991 and 1992 of both the individual appellant and his

Sobier J.T.C.C. (orally): — Thank you. I think I could give judgment from the Bench.

Beaubier J.T.C.C. (orally): — This matter was heard at Kelowna, British Columbia on March 28, 1996, pursuant to the Informal Procedure. The Appellant was the only witness.

Bowman J.T.C.C.: — This appeal is from an assessment for the appellant’s 1989 taxation year, and specifically for the taxation year comprising the fiscal period commencing on July 1, 1989 and ending December 31, 1989.

Sarchuk J.T.C.C.: — This is an appeal by RIS-Christie Ltd. (RIS) from assessments of tax with respect to its 1982 and 1983 taxation years. In calculating its income for the taxation year ended December 31, 1982, the Appellant deducted the sum

Bowman J.T.C.C.: - This appeal is from an assessment for the 1992 taxation year. It is concerned with the inclusion in Mr. Chen’s income of $993.92 in respect of contributions that he made to a registered retirement savings plan. If this case

Teskey J.T.C.C. (orally): — Mr. Adusei, in this country we have several levels of court. The court you have come to today is a trial court. You’ve had your trial. There are two levels of appeal courts: We have the Federal Court

St-Onge J.T.C.C. (orally): - The appeal of Freddy Yousfan was heard on the twenty-ninth (29th) of July nineteen ninety-six (1996) in the city of Montreal, province of Quebec, and the issue is to know if the appellant can prove his