Stefan Danis v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1996] 3 CTC 2889 (Informal Procedure) -- text

Taylor J.T.C.C.: — These are appeals heard in Toronto, Ontario, on August 2, 1996 against assessments for the years 1991, 1992 and 1993, in which the Respondent had disallowed rental losses claimed against other income, under the Income

Alan Zhuang v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1996] 3 CTC 2886 (Informal Procedure) -- text

Sobier J.T.C.C. (orally): — The Appellant in this proceeding filed his Notice of Appeal with the Court apparently on or about January 29th, 1996 because there is a document called “Notice of Appeal, informal procedure” signed by Mr. Zhuang

Mervin L. Riddell v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1996] 3 CTC 2869, 97 DTC 51 -- text

Bowman J.T.C.C.: — These appeals are from assessments for the 1989, 1990 and 1991 taxation years. They involve the deductibility of losses sustained by the appellant in respect of a single family dwelling in Tucson, Arizona. The principal basis of

James H. Odishaw Professional Corporation and James H. Odishaw v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1996] 3 CTC 2863, 97 DTC 23 -- text

Bowman J.T.C.C.: — These appeals were heard together on common evidence. They relate to assessments made under the Income Tax Act for the taxation years 1990, 1991 and 1992 of both the individual appellant and his

Coastal Construction and Excavating Limited v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1996] 3 CTC 2845, 97 DTC 26 -- text

Bowman J.T.C.C.: — This appeal is from an assessment for the appellant’s 1989 taxation year, and specifically for the taxation year comprising the fiscal period commencing on July 1, 1989 and ending December 31, 1989.

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS