Zovko v. R., [1999] 4 CTC 2685, 99 DTC 1001 -- text
Bowie T.C.J.:
Whyte v. R., [1999] 4 CTC 2678, 99 DTC 994 -- text
Beaubier T . C.J.:
Veilleux v. R., [1999] 4 CTC 2670, [1999] DTC 1251 -- text
Archambault T.C.J.:
Tremblay v. R., [1999] 4 CTC 2666 -- text
Archambault T.C.J.:
Scamurra v. R., [1999] 4 CTC 2658 (Informal Procedure) -- text
Teskey T.C.J.:
The Appellant in his Notice of Appeal wherein he appealed his reassessment of income tax for the years 1992, 1993 and 1994, elected the informal procedure.
Robichaud v. R., [1999] 4 CTC 2654, 99 DTC 41 -- text
Tardif T.C.J.:
Pirie v. R., [1999] 4 CTC 2650 (Informal Procedure) -- text
Beaubier T.C.J.:
Perrie v. R., [1999] 4 CTC 2642 (Informal Procedure) -- text
Lamarre Proulx T.C.J.:
Pazaratz v. R., [1999] 4 CTC 2640 -- text
Brulé T.C.JA
This appeal, pursuant to the informal procedure respecting the Appellant’s claim that he was not liable to be taxed on car expenses during the 1995 taxation year, was heard at Toronto, Ontario, on November 25, 1998. The Appellant
Millette v. R., [1999] 4 CTC 2621, 99 DTC 527 -- text
Lamarre Proulx T.C.J.:
The appellant is appealing from reassessments by the Minister of National Revenue (“the Minister”) for the 1986 to 1992 taxation years.
Pages
