Arthur Salt, Elwin E Howlett, Eldred Edward Jamieson v. Minister of National Revenue, [1979] CTC 2420, 79 DTC 361 -- text

M J Bonner:—These three appeals were heard together. Much of the evidence was common to the issues in all three appeals. In all there was a dispute as to the value on December 31, 1971, (V-day) of lands lying in a more or less

Wayne Bruce Biles v. Minister of National Revenue, [1979] CTC 2411, 79 DTC 358 -- text

Delmer E Taylor:—This is an appeal heard in Toronto, Ontario, on March 1, 1979, against income tax assessments in which the Minister of National Revenue disallowed as deductions for alimony payments, the amounts of $6,978, $8,557.20, and $1,906.69 for

Arichandra M Coomaraswamy v. Minister of National Revenue, [1979] CTC 2407, 79 DTC 355 -- text

Delmer E Taylor:—This is an appeal heard in Toronto, Ontario, on March 1, 1979, against assessments of income tax for the years 1972, 1973, 1974 and 1975. The assessments for the first three years are based on the inclusion by the

Marsh & McLennan Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1979] CTC 2388, 79 DTC 314 -- text

Roland St-Onge:—The appeals of Marsh & McLennan Limited and Harry Price Hilborn Insurance Ltd came before me on February 14, 1979, at the City of Toronto, Ontario and it was agreed between counsel that the evidence in the appeal of Marsh &

Harry Price, Hilborn Insurance Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1979] CTC 2379, 79 DTC 327 -- text

Roland St-Onge:—This appeal in respect of an income tax assessment for the 1976 taxation year was heard on common evidence with the appeal of Marsh & McLennan Limited (78-877) on February 14, 1979.

For the reasons given in the Marsh & McLennan Limited appeal, a copy of which is attached hereto, the appeal is allowed and the matter referred back to the respondent for reconsideration and reassessment accordingly.

Appeal allowed.

Wilfred H Browne v. Minister of National Revenue, [1979] CTC 2376, 79 DTC 342 -- text

The Chairman:—This is the appeal of Wilfred H Browne from an income tax reassessment dated March 1, 1977, by which the respondent added to the appellant’s income for the 1973 taxation year an amount of $18,250.50 as being his share of the

DR Beverly a Burgess v. Minister of National Revenue, [1979] CTC 2374, 79 DTC 347 -- text

M J Bonner:—The appellant appeals from an assessment of income tax for her 1974 taxation year. The respondent, on assessing, disallowed the appellant’s claim to deduct in computing income the sum of $5,900 in legal fees and disbursements incurred as

Canadian Pacific Hotels Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1979] CTC 2370, 79 DTC 274 -- text

Roland St-Onge:—The appeal of Canadian Pacific Hotels Limited came before me on June 20, 1978, at the City of Montreal, Quebec, and the issue is whether the appellant was, by law, obliged to withhold the sum of $11,231.80 for the period between

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS