Mahoney, J:—This is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Review Board, [1974] CTC 2095; 74 DTC 1054, upholding a determination that, for its 1966, 1967 and 1968 taxation years, the plaintiff was an associated company with Imperial Optical Co Ltd,

Martland, J (concurred in by Spence, Pigeon, Dickson and Beetz, JJ):—This is an appeal from a decision of the Federal Court of Appeal which upheld a judgment of the Federal Court, Trial Division, which had dismissed with costs an action, launched

Smith, DJ:—The issue in this case is whether $19,000 expended by the defendant and his partner, J I Kjeldsli, was a deductible expenditure as claimed by the defendant, in his income tax return for the year 1969, made for the purpose of

Walsh, J:—This is an appeal from the decision of the Tax Review Board dated March 25, 1977, dismissing plaintiff’s appeal from an income tax assessment for its 1973 taxation year. In assessing plaintiff the Minister of National Revenue had included in

Cattanach, J:—This is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Review Board dated October 15, 1976 in which it was held that the plaintiff, Leonard Mendels was not entitled to deduct an amount of $10,000 in computing his income for his 1970

Le Dain, J:—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division dismissing an appeal from a decision of the Tax Review Board, which dismissed the appellant’s appeal from an assessment for income tax in respect of the 1965 taxation

Collier, J:—This appeal was heard on common evidence with another appeal: The Queen v Harry J Perkins (T-462-77).

Urie, J:—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division allowing with costs an appeal from a judgment of the Tax Appeal Board, which Board had allowed appeals from re-assessments of the appellant under Part I of the Income

The Chief Justice:—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division dismissing with costs an appeal from a judgment of the Tax Review Board dismissing an appeal in respect of: assessments under ‘Part I of the Income Tax

Collier, J:—The Plaintiff for the 1975 taxation year, filed a return in which he computed his income in accordance with section 114 of the Income Tax Act, RSC 1952, c 148, as amended by SC 1970-71-72, c 63 and further