Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the CRA.
Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle de l'ARC.
Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the Department. Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle du ministère.
SUBJECT: TAXABLE BENEFIT-INTEREST FREE LOAN TO BENEFICIARIES SECTION: 105(1)]
ISSUE SHEET
Question 40 - Benefit on Interest-Free Loans to Beneficiaries (1991 Canadian Tax Foundation Roundtable)
Issue
The question asked Revenue Canada to confirm that it will not assess a taxable benefit under subsection 105(1) where a trust makes an interest-free loan to a beneficiary.
Answer
The answer stated that, as indicated in question 22 of the 1990 Roundtable, the court in Cooper v MNR, 88 DTC 6525 (F.C.T.D.), decided that an interest-free loan to a beneficiary did not result in a subsection 105(1) taxable benefit and the Department will apply this decision in similar situations.
Discussion
The reference to the question in the 1990 Roundtable was to question 24, not 22, at page 50:14 of the 1990 Conference Report.
The Cooper case was decided in the taxpayer's favour. In this case, a beneficiary of a trust received an interest-free loan from the trust and the Minister included in the beneficiary's income under subsection 105(1) a taxable benefit for interest computed under Regulation 4300(6).
In a very detailed analysis, the court compared the requirement for inclusion of the value of benefits in income under subsection 105(1) to similar requirements in sections 6 and 15 applicable to employees and shareholders, respectively. The court concluded that, prior to the enactment of section 80.4 in 1979 which deems prescribed interest on interest-free loans to employees and shareholders to be benefits, such interest was not a benefit that was taxable under sections 6 and 15; and since section 80.4 does not contain any reference to section 105, section 105 does not apply to the value of interest-free loans to beneficiaries from trusts. See pages 6535 and 6536.
That Revenue Canada has adopted the position in the Cooper case was published in the 1991 and 1990 CTF Roundtables and in an external opinion to XXX dated July 19, 1990 (File # 901275). See also Appeals Decision 89-16 dated March 22, 1989.
Prepared by: John Chan
May 25, 1992
5-921238
All rights reserved. Permission is granted to electronically copy and to print in hard copy for internal use only. No part of this information may be reproduced, modified, transmitted or redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in a retrieval system for any purpose other than noted above (including sales), without prior written permission of Canada Revenue Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 1992
Tous droits réservés. Il est permis de copier sous forme électronique ou d'imprimer pour un usage interne seulement. Toutefois, il est interdit de reproduire, de modifier, de transmettre ou de redistributer de l'information, sous quelque forme ou par quelque moyen que ce soit, de facon électronique, méchanique, photocopies ou autre, ou par stockage dans des systèmes d'extraction ou pour tout usage autre que ceux susmentionnés (incluant pour fin commerciale), sans l'autorisation écrite préalable de l'Agence du revenu du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.
© Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 1992
Email this Content