Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the CRA.
Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle de l'ARC.
|
911618 |
|
R.B. Day |
|
(613) 957-2136 |
|
July 11, 1991 |
We are writing in reply to your letter of June 7. 1991, wherein you requested our views with respect to certain income tax issues related to 24(1). Our understanding of the situation set out in your letter is as follows.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Our Comments
We will respond to the questions posed in your letter in the order in which they appear.
Value of board, lodging and incidentals as employment income
It is our opinion that the value of the board, lodging and other incidentals would be included in the 24(1) income from an office or employment by virtue of paragraph 6(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act (the Act). We are unable to agree with your rationale for the exclusion of these benefits from the 24(1) income. The board and lodging etc., would, in our view, be considered to be a "perquisite of the employment" similar to the situations discussed in paragraph 4 of IT-470R.
Deduction of earned income under subsection 110(2) of the Act
Although it would appear that, technically, no amount could be deducted under subsection 110(2) of the Act because of the taxable benefit computed under paragraph 6(l)(a) of the Act, for administrative purposes the Department will permit the deduction of both the employment income paid to the 24(1) plus the value of the taxable benefit under subsection 110(2) of the Act. This opinion is based on the assumption that all of the requirements of subsection 110(2) of the Act are met in each and every instance where such a claim is being made.
Application of sections 122.4 and 122.5 of the Act
Since the amounts computed under subsection 110(2) of the Act are deductible in computing taxable income and not net income, for purposes of computing the Federal tax credit and the goods and services tax credit, net income would be the aggregate of the 24(1), employment incomes and the taxable benefits in the above scenario.
We trust our comments will be of assistance to you.
Yours truly,
for DirectorBusiness and General DivisionRulings DirectorateLegislative and Intergovernmental Affairs Branch
c.c. D. Dimillo Assessing and Enquiries Division Returns Processing Division
All rights reserved. Permission is granted to electronically copy and to print in hard copy for internal use only. No part of this information may be reproduced, modified, transmitted or redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in a retrieval system for any purpose other than noted above (including sales), without prior written permission of Canada Revenue Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 1991
Tous droits réservés. Il est permis de copier sous forme électronique ou d'imprimer pour un usage interne seulement. Toutefois, il est interdit de reproduire, de modifier, de transmettre ou de redistributer de l'information, sous quelque forme ou par quelque moyen que ce soit, de facon électronique, méchanique, photocopies ou autre, ou par stockage dans des systèmes d'extraction ou pour tout usage autre que ceux susmentionnés (incluant pour fin commerciale), sans l'autorisation écrite préalable de l'Agence du revenu du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.
© Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 1991