Date: 20101001
Docket: A-294-10
Citation: 2010 FCA
252
CORAM: NOËL J.A.
EVANS J.A.
MAINVILLE J.A.
BETWEEN:
CHRIST
APOSTOLIC CHURCH INTERNATIONAL - CANADA
Appellant
and
CANADA
REVENUE AGENCY - CHARITIES DIRECTORATE
Respondent
Dealt with in writing without appearance
of parties.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario,
on October 1, 2010.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: MAINVILLE
J.A.
CONCURRED
IN BY: NOËL
J.A.
EVANS
J.A.
Date: 20101001
Docket: A-294-10
Citation: 2010 FCA 252
CORAM: NOËL
J.A.
EVANS J.A.
MAINVILLE
J.A.
BETWEEN:
CHRIST APOSTOLIC CHURCH
INTERNATIONAL - CANADA
Appellant
and
CANADA REVENUE AGENCY -
CHARITIES DIRECTORATE
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
MAINVILLE J.A
[1]
This
concerns a motion by the respondent seeking an order quashing this appeal. The
respondent contends that the appeal to this Court is made under paragraph
172(3)(a.1) of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985, c.2 (5th
Supp.), as amended, and that the conditions for such an appeal to be initiated
have yet to be fulfilled.
[2]
On
July 16, 2010 the appellant was notified through registered mail that the
Minister of National Revenue proposed to revoke its registration within 30 days
pursuant to paragraphs 168(1)(b), 168(1)(d) and 168(1)(e) of the Income Tax
Act. The notice of the Minister’s proposal further indicated that if the
appellant wished to object to the intention to revoke its registration, it
could provide within 90 days a written notice of objection pursuant to
subsection 168(4) of the Income Tax Act.
[3]
In
an affidavit dated August 27, 2010, Martine Mandeville, a program/project
manager in the Charities Redress Section of the Appeals Branch of the Canada
Revenue Agency, confirms that as of the date of her affidavit, a notice of
objection had not been filed by the appellant in respect of the proposed
revocation of its registration.
[4]
The
appellant rather filed a notice of appeal in this Court on August 17, 2010
challenging the revocation of its registration on the grounds that the
appellant organization is new and that the loss of its registration will impede
its ability to assist single mothers, young offenders and newcomers to Canada.
[5]
The
effect of subsection 168(4) of the Income Tax Act is to extend the
objection review process of section 165 of that Act to charity registration revocations.
It is only after such a review has been initiated that an appeal concerning the
revocation of the registration may be brought before the Federal Court of
Appeal in the circumstances set out in paragraph 172(3)(a.1) of the Income
Tax Act.
[6]
Thus,
the Income Tax Act provides that an appeal to this Court regarding the
revocation of the registration of a charity is subject to (a) the appellant first
serving on the Minister of National Revenue a prior notice of objection
pursuant to subsection 168(4) of the Income Tax Act and (b) the Minister
either confirming the revocation of the registration of a charity or not
confirming or vacating such revocation within 90 days of the notice of
objection.
[7]
It
should however be noted that a charitable organization may apply to this Court
or a judge of this Court pursuant to paragraph 168(2) of the Income Tax Act
in order to seek an extension of time before a notice is published in the Canada
Gazette to give effect to the revocation of a registration.
[8]
In
the circumstances at hand and with the facts as stated in the uncontested
motion, it must be concluded that this appeal is premature.
[9]
The
90 day timeline for the appellant to serve a notice of objection pursuant to
subsection 168(4) of the Income Tax Act has not yet expired.
Consequently, I would dismiss this appeal without prejudice to the rights of
the appellant, notably its right to submit a notice of objection pursuant to
subsection 168(4) of the Income Tax Act and to eventually bring forth,
if it deems it appropriate, a new appeal in this Court compliant with paragraph
172(3)(a.1) of that Act.
[10]
There
shall be no order as to costs.
"Robert
M. Mainville"
“I
agree
Marc Noël J.A.”
“I
agree
John M. Evans J.A.”
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-294-10
STYLE OF CAUSE: Christ Apostolic Church
International – Canada v. Canada Revenue Agency –
Charities Directorate
MOTION
DEALT WITH IN WRITING WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF PARTIES
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: Mainville J.A.
CONCURRED IN BY: Noël
J.A.
Evans J.A.
DATED: October 1, 2010
WRITTEN
REPRESENTATIONS BY:
|
|
Carol Calabrese
|
FOR
THE RESPONDENT
|
SOLICITORS
OF RECORD:
|
|
Myles J. Kirvan
Deputy
Attorney General of Canada
|
FOR
THE RESPONDENT
|