Date: 20090121
Docket: A-326-07
Citation: 2009 FCA
13
Present: PELLETIER J.A.
BETWEEN:
EDNA BRASS, MARLENE BRASS,
MAVIS BRASS, NICOLE BRASS,
WANDA BREMNER, CAROL O’SOUP, FERNIE
O’SOUP, GLEN O’SOUP,
LUCY O’SOUP, LYNN O’SOUP, PERCY O’SOUP,
PETER O’SOUP,
SELWYN O’SOUP and GERALDINE WARDMAN
each on their own behalf and on behalf of
all members of the Key Band First Nation
Appellants
and
KEY BAND FIRST NATION,
THE CHIEF AND COUNCIL OF THE KEY BAND
FIRST NATION,
THE MINISTER OF INDIAN AFFAIRS AND
NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT
and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondents
Dealt with in writing without appearance
of parties.
Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario,
on January 21, 2009.
REASONS
FOR ORDER BY: PELLETIER
J.A.
Date: 20090121
Docket: A-326-07
Citation: 2009 FCA 13
Present: PELLETIER
J.A.
BETWEEN:
EDNA BRASS, MARLENE BRASS, MAVIS BRASS,
NICOLE BRASS,
WANDA BREMNER, CAROL O’SOUP, FERNIE
O’SOUP, GLEN O’SOUP,
LUCY O’SOUP, LYNN O’SOUP, PERCY O’SOUP,
PETER O’SOUP,
SELWYN O’SOUP and GERALDINE WARDMAN
each on their own behalf and on behalf of
all members of the Key Band First Nation
Appellants
and
KEY BAND FIRST NATION,
THE CHIEF AND COUNCIL OF THE KEY BAND
FIRST NATION,
THE MINISTER OF INDIAN AFFAIRS AND
NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT
and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondents
REASONS FOR ORDER
PELLETIER J.A.
[1]
This is a motion brought by the appellants’
solicitors seeking leave to withdraw as solicitors of record. The appellants
are fourteen individuals, “each on their own behalf and on behalf of all
members of the Key Band First Nation”. The notice of motion seeking the removal
of the solicitors from the record was served on one Myrna Bushie, who is not a
party. The explanation offered is that Myrna Bushie was the designated liaison
between the appellants and their counsel. Counsel who had carriage of this
matter on behalf of the solicitors of record deposes that he does not know any
of the appellants personally and does not have addresses for them. Counsel
further deposes that, based on his past experience, he believes that the said
Myrna Bushie will communicate the contents of the notice of motion to the
appellants.
[2]
The motion is brought under Rule 125 of the Federal
Courts Rules SOR/.98-106 which provides as follows:
|
125. (1) Where a solicitor of record ceases to act for a party and the
party has not changed its solicitor of record in accordance with rule 124,
the Court may, on a motion of the solicitor, order that the solicitor be
removed from the record.
|
125. (1)
Lorsque l’avocat inscrit au dossier ne représente plus une partie et que
celle-ci n’a pas effectué le changement conformément à la règle 124, la Cour
peut, sur requête de l’avocat, rendre une ordonnance de cessation d’occuper.
|
[3]
This rule allows a solicitor who has ceased to
act for a party to be removed from the record if the solicitor’s client has not
appointed a new solicitor in accordance with Rule 124. Rule 125 does not deal
with the withdrawal of counsel from a retainer in circumstances where leave of
the court is required, nor with the removal of counsel at the instance of
another party on the basis of conflict of interest. The rule is clear that the
motion contemplated by the rule may only be brought by the solicitor who has
ceased to act.
[4]
It is not clear whether this is an application
to be removed from the record after the solicitor of record has advised the
appellants of his intention to cease acting for them and no other solicitor has
been appointed, or whether the solicitors of record believe that leave of the
court is required in order for them to withdraw as solicitors for the
appellants. Assuming that the motion results from the failure of the appellants
to appoint new solicitors, the rules regarding service which appear at Rule
125(2) apply. Those rules do not contemplate service as it was effected here.
Since there has been no response to the notice of motion, this is not a case
where service can be validated pursuant to Rule 147. Consequently,
consideration of this motion will be adjourned until the solicitors of record
file proof of service in accordance with Rule 125(2).
"J.D.
Denis Pelletier"
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-326-07
STYLE OF CAUSE: Edna
Brass et al
v. Key Band First Nation et al
MOTION DEALT WITH IN WRITING WITHOUT
APPEARANCE OF PARTIES
REASONS FOR ORDER BY: PELLETIER J.A.
DATED: January 21, 2009
WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY:
|
Ivan Holloway
Luke R. Bernas
|
FOR THE APPELLANT
|
|
James
Jodouin
Karen Jones
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
KEY BAND FIRST NATION
ET AL
FOR THE RESPONDENT
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
|
D'Arcy & Deacon
Winnipeg, MB
|
FOR THE APPELLANT
|
|
Bainbridge
Jodouin Cheecham
Saskatoon, SK
John H. Sims, Q.C.
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
KEY BAND FIRST NATION
ET AL
FOR THE RESPONDENT
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
|
Email this Content