Date: 20110316
Docket: IMM-4829-10
Citation: 2011
FC 316
Toronto, Ontario,
March 16, 2011
PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Campbell
BETWEEN:
|
AIQIN LIN
|
|
|
Applicant
|
and
|
|
THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
|
|
|
Respondent
|
REASONS FOR ORDER AND
ORDER
[1]
The
present Application concerns a citizen of China who has asked for the following
relief from Canada’s immigration system:
- An application for refugee
protection dated September 17, 1995 that was ultimately dismissed by this Court
on August 12, 1997;
- An application for permanent
residence on humanitarian and compassionate (H&C) grounds dated December
15, 2003 in which risk issues were advanced;
- A withdrawal of the risk issues
from the H&C application by letter dated May 29, 2009;
A decision of August 4, 2010 on the amended H&C
application is the decision presently under review.
[2]
A
critically important H&C issue is the Applicant’s establishment in Canada.
It is not contested that a period of seven years between the application and
the decision is unusual in the present context of immigration decision-making.
The evidence before the H&C Officer goes to prove that, in this intervening
period, the Applicant became firmly established in Canada. It is important to
note that at no time following the Applicant’s arrival in Canada was a move
made to remove her from Canada. As a result, I find that it was incumbent on
the H&C Officer to make a realistic and empathetic decision with respect to
the Applicant’s establishment. In my opinion, the decision rendered does not
meet this reasonable expectation.
[3]
In the
decision the H&C Officer said this about establishment:
I have considered that the applicant’s
establishment in Canada has not been attained due to a prolonged inability to
depart Canada or due to circumstances beyond her control. Rather, the applicant
acknowledges on her application that she was asked to leave Canada in MAY 1997
when her claim for Convention refugee status was refused. Despite the
knowledge that she did not have the legal status to remain, and that she is the
subject of an enffective[sic] removal order, the applicant has chosen to remain
in Canada at her own risk. I am not satisfied that the applicant’s personal
circumstances are such that they were not anticipated by the legislation.
[Emphasis added]
(Applicant’s Application Record, p. 10)
In my opinion the question of the Applicant’s status in
Canada is the result of a shared responsibility between the Applicant and the
Respondent. The Applicant has an obligation to regularize her status if she
wishes to remain in Canada, and the Respondent has an obligation to reasonably
respond to her attempts to do so. In the present case the Applicant met her
responsibility by making an H&C application, which she is entitled to do.
However, in my opinion, the Respondent’s failure to render a decision within
seven years is unreasonable. Of course the Applicant continued to put down
roots in Canada during this hiatus period; it is not a matter of accepting risk
to do so, it is a matter of getting on with life while waiting, and waiting. In
reaching a fair and reasonable decision, this fact was required to be
acknowledged and carefully analysed, with some respect. Since it was not, I
find the decision rendered is unreasonable because it is not defensible on the
facts.
ORDER
Accordingly, the decision under review is set
aside and the matter is referred back for redetermination to a differently
constituted panel.
There is no question to certify.
“Douglas
R. Campbell”
FEDERAL COURT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: IMM-4829-10
STYLE
OF CAUSE: AIQIN
LIN v. THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP
AND IMMIGRATION
PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO
DATE OF HEARING: MARCH 15, 2011
REASONS FOR ORDER
AND ORDER BY: CAMPBELL J.
DATED: MARCH 16, 2011
APPEARANCES:
Nancy Myles Elliott
|
FOR THE APPLICANT
|
Michael Butterfield
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nancy Myles Elliott
Barrister and Solicitor
Toronto, Ontario
|
FOR THE APPLICANT
|
Myles J. Kirvan
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Toronto, Ontario
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|