The taxpayer paid a fee to a financial advisor, calculated as 0.7% of the market value of its equity and of the amount of its long-term debt net of working capital, in consideration for advice provided in connection with considering alternatives to maximize shareholders' value, with an emphasis on merger possibilities. The transaction ultimately implemented entailed the taxpayer's shareholders selling their shares, pursuant to a plan of arrangement, to another publicly-traded oil and gas company in consideration for treasury shares of that purchaser.
After noting that the Crown was precluded from arguing that the fees were a capital expenditure because the manner in which the case had been pleaded, Bowman A.C.J. noted that, in any event, "here no capital asset was acquired, nothing of an enduring benefit came into existence nor was any capital asset preserved".