CCRA Annual Report to Parliament 2002-2003
Disclaimer
We do not guarantee the accuracy of this copy of the CRA website.
Scraped Page Content
Our Overall Performance
In 2002-2003, the CCRA met its two strategic outcomes—compliance and innovation. We delivered on most of the commitments set out in our Corporate Business Plan and, overall, met our expected outcomes and anticipated results in each business line. We made good progress in implementing performance improvement plans for each business line to fill performance gaps identified in last year's Annual Report. In some cases, however, our ability to take corrective action was constrained by the need to deploy resources against immediate risks and to maintain the integrity of our core programs. Exhibits 5 and 6 provide more information on the CCRA's performance against these two strategic outcomes.
Assessment of Compliance
In terms of our performance against the first strategic outcome, we are proud of the high overall level of voluntary compliance that exists in Canada today. About 94% of all the cash receipts that are remitted to the CCRA are reported and paid without any audit or collection activities. Moreover, as illustrated in Exhibit 4, we find that compliance is reasonably high for each of the five key compliance indicators: filing, registration, border and trade, remittance, and reporting. Many of our measures show improvement this year, although filing and remittance compliance by corporations appears to have declined somewhat. Although some variation from year to year is to be expected, we continue to monitor compliance trends and take action as appropriate.
Our indicators have been expanded this year to include measures of filing and remittance compliance for the some 1.4 million employers who collect and remit source deductions for about 18.5 million individuals, representing 84.6% of personal income tax receipts. The results show that the vast majority of employers file their T4 information slips without any intervention by the CCRA and over 90% of employers remit on time. We are not aware of any reliable and accurate method for estimating the overall level of reporting compliance. Our assessment of reporting compliance is therefore more qualitative and relies on information from our compliance programs and other indirect measures. Our judgement, based on our experience, available evidence, and estimates, is that while reporting non-compliance is certainly material, it remains at relatively low levels—in line with prior years and compared to other countries. Much of our assurance is derived from our comprehensive system of checks and balances (described under Assisted Compliance) that promotes accurate reporting of income and trade data and facilitates the early detection of reporting errors. As our Compliance Measurement Framework and our Compliance Improvement Plan mature, we anticipate that our assessment will be guided by a more comprehensive set of compliance indicators.
Exhibit 5: Strategic Outcome Statement – Compliance
Strategic Outcome: |
|||||
Actual Results
|
Overall levels of compliance continue to be high, as compared to 2001-2002 and as further demonstrated by our performance against expected outcomes for our business lines. |
||||
As demonstrated by: |
|
||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
- Date modified:
- 2003-10-29