Board of Management Oversight Framework - Assessment Performance - Introduction

Disclaimer

We do not guarantee the accuracy of this copy of the CRA website.

Scraped Page Content

Introduction

Role of the Board of Management

While still part of the Public Service of Canada, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) has a unique governance structure. Under Section 31 of the Canada Revenue Agency Act , the Board of Management (Board) is responsible for overseeing the organization and administration of the Agency and the management of its resources, services, property, personnel and contracts. The Board therefore fulfills several of the management oversight functions for the CRA that the Treasury Board Secretariat does for regular departments.

Development of the Board of Management Oversight Framework

During 2006-2007, the Board oversaw the development of the Board of Management Oversight Framework (BoMOF), a key accountability instrument that complements the Treasury Board Secretariat's (TBS) Management Accountability Framework (MAF). The BoMOF sets out a clear list of management expectations, addressing directly the oversight responsibilities conferred on the Board under the Canada Revenue Agency Act . The BoMOF facilitates for the Board a comprehensive, annual overview of CRA management processes, practices, and results.

Structure of the BoMOF

The BoMOF is structured around the Board's five main Areas of Oversight as outlined in the CRA Act:

  • Organization of the Agency
  • Administration of the Agency
  • Management of Resources
  • Management of Services
  • Management of Personnel

Each Area of Oversight is further structured according to the Board's Expectations for good management. Each Expectation is supported by Key Questions that further delineate good management practices and provide the basis for the Board's assessment of Agency management.

Annual Assessment of Performance

Each year the Board performs an Assessment of Performance (Assessment) against the BoMOF. The BoMOF Assessment is the most important function the Board fulfills. Traditionally, a sub-committee of the Board has been delegated full authority to perform the Assessment. During the assessment, sub-committee members discuss management performance in-depth and further probe issues. Assistant Commissioners responsible for corporate functions falling within the Areas of Oversight are present at the Assessment to answer questions and provide context. The Assessment is then presented to the Board for its approval.

Performance information that has been presented to the Board throughout the year is compiled and summarized in the Assessment. Performance narratives and results are substantiated via a list of Sources of Evidence. The Assessment is performed at the Expectation level. Performance against each Expectation is given a rating of Strong, Acceptable, Opportunity for Improvement or Attention Required. Any corrective actions or follow-up required on the part of management are identified in the Next Steps. The Next Steps from the Assessment informs the Board's following year's Corporate Business Plan chapter, Strategic Planning Meeting, Commissioner's objectives with the Board, as well as the Board Plan and the committees' work plans.

Evolution of the BoMOF

Like the MAF and other management assessment instruments, the BoMOF will continue to evolve in concert with management best practices, as well as the management capacity of the CRA. Increased emphasis will continue to be placed on actual management results as the Agency's management systems and processes reach full maturation.

The BoMOF has been structured so as to not duplicate the TBS's MAF except in the areas of Information Technology, Financial Management and Enterprise Risk Management and Internal Accountability Structure. The Board maintains its decision to assess these areas given that they form key parts of its fiduciary oversight responsibilities. A comparison of MAF and BoMOF is provided at the end of this document.

What's New for 2009-2010

Some of the Expectations and Key Questions have been modified or combined for 2009-2010, in line with the Board's direction. In particular, increased focus has been placed on the inclusion of questions that deal with the actual results of management processes and systems. Some formatting changes have also been introduced, such as including the Board's rating and comments from the previous year's Assessment for each Expectation. The rating criteria for each Area of Oversight have been placed at the beginning of each respective section.

The CRA received its final MAF Round VII assessment results in late April. The Agency improved its rating from last year in Information Management, from Opportunity for Improvement to Acceptable. All other ratings remained the same. The results are as follows:

Management Accountability Assessment Ratings for Canada Revenue Agency


BoMOF Expectations
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
Organization of the Agency
  • Internal Accountability Structure Susan Bowen
Strong
Strong
Strong
Administration of the Agency
  • Enterprise Risk Management Stephen O'Connor
Acceptable
Strong
Strong
  • Program Evaluation Patricia MacDonald
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
  • Internal Audit
    Patricia MacDonald
Strong
Strong
Strong
  • Sustainable Development Stephen O'Connor
Strong
Strong
Strong
Management of Resources
  • Financial Management Stephen O'Connor
Not Applicable
Strong
Strong
  • Project Management Stephen O'Connor
Strong
Acceptable
Strong
  • Asset Management Stephen O'Connor
Strong
Strong
Strong
  • Procurement Management Stephen O'Connor
Strong
Strong
Strong
  • Information Technology –Investments
    Peter Poulin
Strong
Strong
Strong
  • Information Technology – Security Peter Poulin
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Strong
Management of Services
  • Service Strategy
    Susan Bowen
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
  • Service Performance Measurement Susan Bowen/Sandra Lavigne
Strong
Acceptable
Acceptable
  • Service Redress Mechanism Fred O'Riordan
Acceptable
Strong
Acceptable
Management of Personnel
  • Workforce
Strong
Strong
Strong
  • CRA Values & Ethics
    Cheryl Fraser
Strong
Strong
Strong
  • Learning
    Cheryl Fraser
Strong
Strong
Strong
  • Workplace Practices
    Cheryl Fraser
Strong
Strong
Strong


Management Accountability Assessment Ratings for Canada Revenue Agency


MAF – Areas of Management
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
  • Corporate Management Structure
Acceptable
Strong
Strong
  • Corporate Risk Management
Acceptable
Strong
Strong
  • Corporate Performance Framework
Acceptable
Strong
Strong
  • Contribution to Government-wide Priorities
Strong
Strong
Strong
  • Quality of Analysis in TB Submissions
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
  • Quality of Performance Reporting
Acceptable
Strong
Strong
  • Financial Management and Control
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
  • Information Management
Acceptable
Opportunity for Improvement
Acceptable
  • IT Management
Strong
Strong
Strong
  • Management of Security & Business Continuity
Strong
Strong
Strong
  • Citizen-focused Service
Acceptable
Acceptable
Not Applicable



Explanation of MAF Ratings
Strong
No deficiencies in any of the measures and sustained performance for the indicator that exceeds Treasury Board Portfolio's (TBP) expectations and suggests continued strong performance
Acceptable
No significant deficiencies in any of the measures and meets (TBP) expectations
Opportunity for Improvement
Moderate deficiencies, or deficiencies in some of the measures listed for the indicator and evidence of attention to the deficiencies and progress
Attention Required
Significant deficiencies, or deficiencies in most of the measures listed for the indicator and/or inadequate attention to the deficiencies
Source: Treasury Board of Canada




Date modified:
2010-11-15