Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the CRA.
Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle de l'ARC.
E. E. Campbell (613) 957-2067 HBW 8701-6
May 3, 1990
Dear xxxxx
Indian Remission Order P.C. 1988-787
In a recent telephone conversation we discussed the above order and a request that had been made to your Department to effect an order which would parallel the above-noted.
Determining the correct method of taxing Indians has over the years proven to be a difficult task. At one point the residence of the Indian was considered to have been the deciding factor. However, that position was abandoned and until theNowegijickcase an Indian was not taxed on income earned on a reserve but was subject to tax on income earned off a reserve.
In 1983 the Supreme Court of Canada found inNowegijick v. The Queen...[[1983] C.T.C. 20] "that treaties and statutes relating to Indians should be liberally construed and doubtful expressions resolved in favour of the Indian. If the statute contains language which can reasonably be construed to confer tax exemption, that construction... is to be favoured over a more technical construction which might be available to deny exemption".
The Court found that the taxable income was personal property and was paid by a company whose head office was on the reserve. That being so, it was properly exempt pursuant to section 87 of the Indian Act as being personal property on a reserve. Where the work is performed is not relevant, but rather where the employer is situated.
A remission order was sponsored by the Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs which had the effect of continuing the practise of exempting from tax employment income earned by an Indian on a reserve regardless of the fact that the employer was not on the reserve.
The remission order was to apply to the taxation years 1983, 1984 and 1985, and in September 1985 we wrote to all of the provinces asking that they pass comparable remission orders to govern the disposition of the provincial tax. Generally, there was little response to the request, and no evident opposition to the proposition, although it had been suggested that an order was unnecessary in the circumstances.
In 1988 a further order-in-council was issued, extending the effect of the earlier order to the 1986 and 1987 taxation years, and the Department has continued to administer the collection of tax as envisaged by the initial order. It must be emphasized that we have not asked that the Indians make specific application to qualify under the orders. For the most part these orders merely legitimize the carrying on of past practise to exempt.
We do not generally expect to receive individual requests and thus will continue to consider the appropriate income tax, which otherwise might have been collected, to be remitted. We should emphasize that generally there will be no refunds except in the most exceptional cases, because nothing would have been collected in the first instance.
We do not know what amount of tax is involved as the result of the remission, due to the lack of previous assessments, but we do not believe that it is significant. The people who are subject to the remission are not in the higher tax brackets, and it is a recognition of this that is implicit in the remission order. While the order reflects government policy, we believe that it is also in keeping with the spirit of the decision in theNowegijickcase.
As indicated to you in our conversation.
xxxxx
It would be appreciated if you could arrange for a specific remission xxxxx of the xxxxx plus interest, and that a general order xxxxx prepared to parallel the federal order. It will allow us to conclude the remission for xxxxx and regularize the general situation.
Thank you for your co-operation.
Yours sincerely,
Christine Savage Acting Director Provincial and International Relations Division
EEC/jb remission (indian) File copy Sequence file Author's copy Reading file Access to Info(2)
All rights reserved. Permission is granted to electronically copy and to print in hard copy for internal use only. No part of this information may be reproduced, modified, transmitted or redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in a retrieval system for any purpose other than noted above (including sales), without prior written permission of Canada Revenue Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 1990
Tous droits réservés. Il est permis de copier sous forme électronique ou d'imprimer pour un usage interne seulement. Toutefois, il est interdit de reproduire, de modifier, de transmettre ou de redistributer de l'information, sous quelque forme ou par quelque moyen que ce soit, de facon électronique, méchanique, photocopies ou autre, ou par stockage dans des systèmes d'extraction ou pour tout usage autre que ceux susmentionnés (incluant pour fin commerciale), sans l'autorisation écrite préalable de l'Agence du revenu du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.
© Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 1990