Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the CRA.
Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle de l'ARC.
|
7-1282 |
|
January 15, 1987 |
CALGARY DISTRICT OFFICE |
HEAD OFFICE |
|
Leasing and Financing |
|
Section |
|
M. Siegel |
(613) 957-2746 |
Attention: G.C. Hoard Chief of AuditThis is in reply to your memoranda of November 13 and December 19, 1986 concerning the tax treatment of grazing leases andgrazing permits. |
We have reviewed the provisions of the Public lands Act of Alberta dealing with grazing leases and the Grazing Permit Regulations to the Public Lands Act. They would both appear to be agreements entered into between a user and the Government of Alberta which allow for the use of and grazing on Crown land. It is our opinion, therefore, that both agreements represent leasehold interests for the purposes of Class 13 of Schedule II of the Income Tax Regulations, the grazing lease being a lease for a term of up to 20 years, the grazing permit being a lease for a term of 1 year.
In order for a leasehold interest to be considered a depreciable property it must have a capital cost. The grazing lease or grazing permit must, therefore, have a capital cost in order to be eligible for the replacement property rules found in subsection 13(4) of the Income Tax Act (the "Act") and the intergenerational rollover rules found in subsection 70(9) of the Act. As a capital property the grazing lease or permit would qualify for the replacement property rules in section 44 of the Act.
We are of the opinion that neither a grazing lease nor a grazing permit is qualified farm property for the purposes of subsection 110.6(1) of the Act. While subsection 248(4) of the Act indicates that an interest in real property includes a leasehold interest in real property, the definition of qualified farm property in subsection 110.6(1) of the Act refers only to real property and as such is not extensive enough to include a leasehold interest such as a grazing lease or a grazing permit.
A disposition of either of these interests would entitle the vendor to claim the general capital gains deduction available pursuant to section 110.6 of the Act, but would not permit the vendor to claim the special capital gains deduction for qualified farm property provided for in section 110.6 of the Act.
Chief Leasing and Financing Section Financial Industries Division Rulings DirectorateLegislative and Intergovernmental Affairs Branch
All rights reserved. Permission is granted to electronically copy and to print in hard copy for internal use only. No part of this information may be reproduced, modified, transmitted or redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in a retrieval system for any purpose other than noted above (including sales), without prior written permission of Canada Revenue Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 1987
Tous droits réservés. Il est permis de copier sous forme électronique ou d'imprimer pour un usage interne seulement. Toutefois, il est interdit de reproduire, de modifier, de transmettre ou de redistributer de l'information, sous quelque forme ou par quelque moyen que ce soit, de facon électronique, méchanique, photocopies ou autre, ou par stockage dans des systèmes d'extraction ou pour tout usage autre que ceux susmentionnés (incluant pour fin commerciale), sans l'autorisation écrite préalable de l'Agence du revenu du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.
© Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 1987