Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the CRA.
Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle de l'ARC.
Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the Department.
Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle du ministère.
Principal Issues:
Is the use of services partnership acceptable?
Position:
Yes, if partnership carries on a business and no abuse of the Act
Reasons:
Question of fact
5-960399
XXXXXXXXXX G. Martineau
Attention: XXXXXXXXXX
March 27, 1996
Dear Sirs:
Re: Management and/or Technical Services Partnerships
This is in reply to your letter of January 15, 1996 wherein you refer to our letter 5-952363 (the "Letter") to you of November 15, 1995.
As stated in the Letter, it is not the Department's practice to determine whether or not subsection 245(2) of the Act would apply to a particular situation without examining all of the relevant facts. Furthermore, your request needs the interpretation of a large number of provisions of the Act which could not be made without an examination of all the relevant documentation. However, the views expressed in our opinion letters 5-8653 and 5-7772 remain applicable.
The Department considers that the use of a services partnership is not unacceptable to the extent the transactions involving such partnership respect the provisions of the Act and that such partnership carries on a bona fide business. Generally, the Department views that a 15% mark-up of the costs of providing the services would not be unreasonable. However, the reasonableness of a fee is a question of fact which can only be determined by a thorough review of the circumstances of each particular situation. Our position stated in answer to question 18 of the Thirty-Seven Canadian Tax Foundation Conference, 1985 Revenue Canada Round Table Questions & Answers would apply in the case of a services partnership.
The above comments reflect an expression of opinion only and are not binding on the Department, as explained in paragraph 21 of Information Circular 70-6R2. We trust, however, that they are of assistance.
Yours truly,
for Director
Financial Industries Division
Income Tax Rulings and
Interpretations Directorate
All rights reserved. Permission is granted to electronically copy and to print in hard copy for internal use only. No part of this information may be reproduced, modified, transmitted or redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in a retrieval system for any purpose other than noted above (including sales), without prior written permission of Canada Revenue Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 1996
Tous droits réservés. Il est permis de copier sous forme électronique ou d'imprimer pour un usage interne seulement. Toutefois, il est interdit de reproduire, de modifier, de transmettre ou de redistributer de l'information, sous quelque forme ou par quelque moyen que ce soit, de facon électronique, méchanique, photocopies ou autre, ou par stockage dans des systèmes d'extraction ou pour tout usage autre que ceux susmentionnés (incluant pour fin commerciale), sans l'autorisation écrite préalable de l'Agence du revenu du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.
© Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 1996