Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the CRA.
Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle de l'ARC.
Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the Department.
Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle du ministère.
Principal Issues:
Foreign affiliate - Are deferred stripping costs related to mining eligible for the adjustment in Regulation 5907(2.1)?
Position:
No.
Reasons:
Stripping costs are not included in the definition of foreign resource property as defined in subsection 66(15) (which refers to the definition of Canadian resource property in the same subsection). They do not fit the definition of capital property in section 54 either. (Plus the wording of the provision seems clear that it is intended to deal with properties, not operating expenses.)
XXXXXXXXXX 951705
Attention: XXXXXXXXXX
April 23, 1996
Dear Sirs:
Re: Subsection 5907(2.1) of the Income Tax Regulations
Mining Industry - Deferred Stripping Costs
We are writing in response to your letter dated June 21, 1995 in which you asked whether subsection 5907(2.1) of the Regulations could apply to deferred stripping costs incurred by a foreign affiliate engaged in mining activities in the United States.
We understand that "deferred stripping costs" is an industry term that is used to describe the mining costs associated with waste rock removal in an open pit mine that are incurred but not immediately charged against earnings for accounting purposes; rather, the costs are accumulated and charged to operating costs pursuant to a formula.
It is our opinion that an adjustment under subsection 5907(2.1) of the Regulations is not available in respect of deferred stripping costs in computing the earnings of the foreign affiliate, as such costs would not be part of the "cost of a ... foreign resource property", within the meaning assigned by paragraph 66(15) of the Act, nor part of the "cost of a capital property" as required by that provision. This would appear to be appropriate as the election is aimed at properties that have value that could be paid out and not at expenses.
The above comments represent our general views with respect to the subject matter of your letter. These comments do not constitute an advance income tax ruling and therefore, as described in paragraph 21 of Information Circular 70-6R2, are not binding on the Department.
Yours truly,
for Director
Reorganizations and International Division
Income Tax Rulings and
Interpretations Directorate
Policy and Legislation Branch
All rights reserved. Permission is granted to electronically copy and to print in hard copy for internal use only. No part of this information may be reproduced, modified, transmitted or redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in a retrieval system for any purpose other than noted above (including sales), without prior written permission of Canada Revenue Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 1996
Tous droits réservés. Il est permis de copier sous forme électronique ou d'imprimer pour un usage interne seulement. Toutefois, il est interdit de reproduire, de modifier, de transmettre ou de redistributer de l'information, sous quelque forme ou par quelque moyen que ce soit, de facon électronique, méchanique, photocopies ou autre, ou par stockage dans des systèmes d'extraction ou pour tout usage autre que ceux susmentionnés (incluant pour fin commerciale), sans l'autorisation écrite préalable de l'Agence du revenu du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.
© Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 1996