Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the CRA.
Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle de l'ARC.
Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the Department.
Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle du ministère.
Institute of Chartered Accountants
of Alberta
Roundtable Questions
Question No. 1
Lease Costs for Standby Charge Purposes
Examples of the types of expenses which Revenue Canada considers to be part of the lease costs which form the base of the amount used to calculate the standby portion of an automobile taxable benefit are listed in paragraph 12 of IT-63R4 (Benefits, Including Standby Charges for an Automobile, from the Personal Use of a Motor Vehicle Supplied by an Employer). Example (b) in that paragraph reads "any charges for repairs and maintenance", and the paragraph also specifies that this applies when the employer is required to pay those amounts to the lessor. Essentially the same point is made at the bottom of page 1-2 of booklet T4130(E), "Employers' Guide to Payroll Deductions - Taxable Benefits and Non-Resident Information", in the section headed "Leasing Costs". That section uses slightly different wording, referring to "maintenance contract" payments to the lessor.
With respect to the above facts:
a)Does Revenue Canada agree that the inclusion of repairs and maintenance expenses in the leasing amount used to calculate the standby charge in the circumstances described above represents double taxation for the employees so affected, since the benefits those employees enjoy by having their employer pay for such repairs and maintenance costs forms part of the recently standardized operating cost benefit of $0.12 per personal kilometre?
b)If Revenue Canada's answer to question (a) above is "No", on what basis does Revenue Canada justify the inclusion of repairs and maintenance costs in their definition of automobile lease costs when they are run through the lessor, and not when the employer pays them directly?
c)If the answer to question (a) above is "Yes", will Revenue Canada amend the wording of their next update s of IT-63 and booklet T4130 accordingly?
DEPARTMENT'S POSITION
The Department recognizes that there may be some apparent inconsistencies in the way that paragraphs 6(1)(e) and (k) operate under the circumstances described in the question and we have brought this matter to the attention of the Department of Finance.
J. Szeszycki
May 4, 1995
All rights reserved. Permission is granted to electronically copy and to print in hard copy for internal use only. No part of this information may be reproduced, modified, transmitted or redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in a retrieval system for any purpose other than noted above (including sales), without prior written permission of Canada Revenue Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 1995
Tous droits réservés. Il est permis de copier sous forme électronique ou d'imprimer pour un usage interne seulement. Toutefois, il est interdit de reproduire, de modifier, de transmettre ou de redistributer de l'information, sous quelque forme ou par quelque moyen que ce soit, de facon électronique, méchanique, photocopies ou autre, ou par stockage dans des systèmes d'extraction ou pour tout usage autre que ceux susmentionnés (incluant pour fin commerciale), sans l'autorisation écrite préalable de l'Agence du revenu du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.
© Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 1995
Email this Content