Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the CRA.
Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle de l'ARC.
Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the Department.
March 4, 1993
International Tax Programs Rulings Directorate
Directorate K.B. Harding
(613) 957-2111
Attention: S. Claude Lemelin
930379
Foreign Tax Credit-Stock Dividends
This is in reply to your memorandum of February 9, 1993 wherein you requested our comments concerning Article X (Dividends) of the Canada-U.K. Income Tax Convention (the "Convention") in the following fact situation.
A Canadian resident individual elected to receive a stock dividend from a U.K. corporation rather than a cash dividend in 1990. The information slips indicated a "notional dividend" totalling XXXXXXXXXX (Pounds). A "notional tax" of XXXXXXXXXX% (XXXXXXXXXX (Pounds)) was also shown on the information slips. This tax represents the tax paid by the corporation as an advance corporation tax (A.C.T.). Inland Revenue indicated in their letter of January 7, 1993 that the payee "is not entitled to a repayment of tax credit as the notional tax, although paid by the company, does not reflect an actual tax liability of the person receiving the shares".(Underlining for emphasis). In previous years when the Canadian individual received a cash dividend, he was in a position to recover the tax withheld in excess of 15% of the gross amount of the dividend (i.e. 10 % of such amount) from the U.K. authorities in accordance with Articles X and XXVII (Miscellaneous Rules) of the Convention.
In accordance with paragraph 12(1)(m) and subsection 90 of the Income Tax Act ( the "Act") amounts received by a taxpayer resident in Canada in the year as, on account or in lieu of payment of, or in satisfaction of, dividends on a share owned by him of the capital stock of a corporation not resident in Canada are included in computing his income for the taxation year. The definition of "dividend" in subsection 248(1) of the Act provides that such term would include most stock dividends. However, the term "amount" in paragraph 248(1)(c) of the Act provides that the amount of any stock dividend is the amount which the paid-up capital of the corporation that paid the dividend is increased by reason of the payment of the dividend. In such situations, we should assume that the value of the "notional dividend" provided by the payer represents the increase in the paid-up capital unless the taxpayer can provide adequate proof that some other figure is more valid.
Paragraph 3(b) of Article X of the Convention provides that "(a) resident of Canada who receives a dividend from a company which is a resident of the United Kingdom shall,...be entitled to a tax credit in respect thereof to which an individual resident in the United Kingdom would have been entitled had he received that dividend...". In accordance with section 230 and paragraph 4(b) of section 249 of the United Kingdom Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 (the "ICTA") an individual who is a resident of the United Kingdom will not be entitled to a refund of the A.C.T.. Accordingly, the Canadian resident will not be entitled to a foreign tax credit nor a refund of the A.C.T. from the U.K. authorities. This would appear to be the authority for the position taken in the letter of January 7, 1993 from the U.K. authorities that the Canadian resident is not entitled to a repayment of the notional tax.
Accordingly, in the above fact situation the taxpayer would be required to include in income the notional dividend of XXXXXXXXXX (Pounds), expressed in Canadian dollars, for Canadian taxation purposes subject to the comments re the term "amount" as set out above. Since the Canadian resident is not entitled to a refund of the A.C.T. when he is in receipt of stock dividends, there is no requirement to include the tax credit (i.e. the notional tax), pursuant to paragraph 4 of Article XXVII of the Convention, in income for Canadian tax purposes. In addition, since there was no tax paid on the stock dividend on behalf of the Canadian resident, he would not be entitled to claim a foreign tax credit nor a refund of the 10% from the U.K. authorities. This position is supported by the letter from the U.K. authorities referred to above.
We trust the above comments are adequate for your purposes.
for Director Reorganizations and Foreign Division Rulings Directorate Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs Branch
All rights reserved. Permission is granted to electronically copy and to print in hard copy for internal use only. No part of this information may be reproduced, modified, transmitted or redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in a retrieval system for any purpose other than noted above (including sales), without prior written permission of Canada Revenue Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 1993
Tous droits réservés. Il est permis de copier sous forme électronique ou d'imprimer pour un usage interne seulement. Toutefois, il est interdit de reproduire, de modifier, de transmettre ou de redistributer de l'information, sous quelque forme ou par quelque moyen que ce soit, de facon électronique, méchanique, photocopies ou autre, ou par stockage dans des systèmes d'extraction ou pour tout usage autre que ceux susmentionnés (incluant pour fin commerciale), sans l'autorisation écrite préalable de l'Agence du revenu du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.
© Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 1993