Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the CRA.
Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle de l'ARC.
|
July 4, 1990 |
SCARBOROUGH DISTRICT OFFICE |
HEAD OFFICE |
Chief of Appeals |
Financial Industries Division |
M.R. Rose |
Peter Lee |
|
(613) 957-2745 |
Attention: Joanne Miller |
Appeals Division |
7-900901 |
|
EACC9470 |
Subject: Inventory Allowance on Leased Asset
In reply to your memorandum of May 23, 1990, we are writing to further clarify certain comments in our previous memoranda of April 11 and May 1, 1990.
The term "purchase option" referred to in paragraph (b) of our previous memorandum of April 11, 1990 (#7-4711) should be read as "purchase option contained either in the lease". The separate agreement and the lease must be entered into at the same time. In accordance with the comments in paragraph 4 of Interpretation Bulletin IT-233R, the separate agreement may either be a verbal agreement or a written agreement. In either case, the separate agreement must be legally enforceable. The essential criteria of an agreement are:
(a) there must be at least two persons;
(b) they must intend the same thing;
(c) their intention must be communicated; and
(d) the object of their intention must be such as will, when carried out, alter their legal position.
The communication of intention must always be reduced to the elements of a proposal made by one party and accepted by the other party. In a situation wherein a company policy of the lessor would allow the lessee to purchase the leased asset from the lessor, the company policy, in and by itself, would not be considered an agreement unless the purchase option has been offered by the lessor and accepted by the lessee. Thus while the separate agreement may be verbal or written, it is obviously much more difficult for a lessor to prove that the above criteria of an agreement have been met if the separate agreement is a verbal one. If a person were to accept that such an agreement did exist, it would be necessary to consider whether the lessor had disposed of the leased asset at the time the agreement was entered into. Please refer to the comments with respect to leasing in Interpretation Bulletin IT-233R and in the Round Table of the 1988 Canadian Tax Foundation Conference.
We hope our comments are helpful to you.
for Chief Leasing and Financing SectionFinancial Industries DivisionRulings Directorate
All rights reserved. Permission is granted to electronically copy and to print in hard copy for internal use only. No part of this information may be reproduced, modified, transmitted or redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in a retrieval system for any purpose other than noted above (including sales), without prior written permission of Canada Revenue Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 1990
Tous droits réservés. Il est permis de copier sous forme électronique ou d'imprimer pour un usage interne seulement. Toutefois, il est interdit de reproduire, de modifier, de transmettre ou de redistributer de l'information, sous quelque forme ou par quelque moyen que ce soit, de facon électronique, méchanique, photocopies ou autre, ou par stockage dans des systèmes d'extraction ou pour tout usage autre que ceux susmentionnés (incluant pour fin commerciale), sans l'autorisation écrite préalable de l'Agence du revenu du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.
© Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 1990