Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the CRA.
Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle de l'ARC.
Revenue Canada Taxation Head Office
W.E. Douglas (613) 957-3496
December 8, 1986
Dear Sirs:
Re: Salary Deferral Arrangements
This is in reply to your letter of August 7, 1986 concerning the following situation.
Your client's employment policy includes additional benefits for long service which is reflected in their vacation policy as follows:
Length of Service (Years) Allowance (Weeks)
1 - 7 3
7 - 15 4
15 - 24 5
24 - 30 6
30 and over 7
Senior management employees receive four weeks from one year to fifteen years of service.
With management approval, an employee who by virtue of long service is entitled to vacation in excess of four weeks may bank the excess for use at a future mutually agreeable time or to provide for earlier retirement.
In addition to the above, employees with long service are entitled to further supplementary vacations once every five years as follows:
after 5 years 1 week
" 10 years 2 weeks
" 20 years 2 weeks
" 25 years 3 weeks
" 30 years 3 weeks
" 35 years 4 weeks
" 40 years 5 weeks
" 45 years 5 weeks
The employees have the option of banking these supplementary entitlements for future use or to provide earlier retirement.
For income tax purposes the client deducts the banked vacations on a "paid basis". When the amount is paid to an employee from his banked vacation balance it is either included in his T4A slip as a retiring allowance or a T4 if the employee has not retired.
Since the above arrangement does not have, as a main purpose, the postponement of tax payable under the Income Tax Act (the "Act"), it is our view that it would not be considered a "salary deferral arrangement" as that term is defined in Bill C-23 which received first reading in the House of Commons on November 7, 1986.
However, we do not concur that the payment of a banked vacation balance to an employee on or after retirement is a "retiring allowance" as defined in subsection 248(1) of the Act. As outlined in paragraphs 4 and 5 of Interpretation Bulletin IT-337R2 , it is our view that such payments constitute employment income under section 5 of the Act.
The above comments are an expression of opinion only and are not binding on the Department. They are, however, our best interpretation of the relevant legislation as it applies generally and we trust that they are of assistance to you.
Yours truly,
for Director General Rulings Directorate Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs Branch
All rights reserved. Permission is granted to electronically copy and to print in hard copy for internal use only. No part of this information may be reproduced, modified, transmitted or redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in a retrieval system for any purpose other than noted above (including sales), without prior written permission of Canada Revenue Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 1986
Tous droits réservés. Il est permis de copier sous forme électronique ou d'imprimer pour un usage interne seulement. Toutefois, il est interdit de reproduire, de modifier, de transmettre ou de redistributer de l'information, sous quelque forme ou par quelque moyen que ce soit, de facon électronique, méchanique, photocopies ou autre, ou par stockage dans des systèmes d'extraction ou pour tout usage autre que ceux susmentionnés (incluant pour fin commerciale), sans l'autorisation écrite préalable de l'Agence du revenu du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.
© Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 1986