Income Tax Severed Letters - 2026-05-13

Ruling

2026 Ruling 2022-0929541R3 - XXXXXXXXXX Mandatory Provident Fund

Unedited CRA Tags
56(1)(a); 60(j)

Principal Issues: In a described situation, can the taxpayer transfer an amount currently held in a registered scheme established under XXXXXXXXXX Mandatory Provident Fund system to her RRSP under paragraph 60(j) of the Act?

Position: Yes.

Reasons: The conditions of paragraph 60(j) are satisfied.

2025 Ruling 2025-1065241R3 - Loss Consolidation

Unedited CRA Tags
12(1)(c) and (x); 20(1)(c); 55(2) and (2.1); 112; Part IV.1; Part IV.6, 245(2).

Principal Issues: Whether a corporation with accumulated non-capital losses can use those losses against interest income on loans made to an related/affiliated corporation; 2) Whether the proposed loss consolidation transactions are consistent with the scheme of the Act.

Position: 1) Yes; 2) Yes.

Reasons: The proposed loss consolidation meets the requirements for deductibility of interest in paragraph 20(1)(c) and the carry forward of accumulated non-capital losses; 2) The proposed transactions will be legally effective, commercially reasonable, and be fully implemented within 36 months of the commencement of the proposed transactions – further, the proposed transactions are consistent with the scheme of the Act as it applies to the use of losses within an affiliated/related group.

2024 Ruling 2024-1031041R3 F - Hybrid Post-mortem Pipeline

Unedited CRA Tags
84(2), 84.1, 245(2)

Principales Questions: 1) Whether section 84.1 applies to deem the Estate to have received a dividend on the disposition of shares to the new corporation or to reduce the PUC of the shares of the new corporation received as consideration for the disposition of the shares. 2) Whether subsection 84(2) will apply to the proposed transactions. 3) Whether subsection 245(2) will apply to the proposed transactions.

Position Adoptée: 1) No. Favorable ruling given. 2) No. Favorable ruling given. 3) No. Favorable ruling given.

Raisons: In accordance with the provisions of the Act and our previous positions.

Technical Interpretation - External

12 June 2023 External T.I. 2022-0956461E5 - Part XIII tax on estate capital distributions

Unedited CRA Tags
212(1)(c); 212(11); 104(13); 214(3)(f); 108(5); 2(3); Regulations 202(1) and 202(8)

Principal Issues: 1) Whether distributions from the capital of an estate of a deceased Canadian resident to XXXXXXXXXX resident beneficiaries are subject to withholding tax; 2) If yes, what is the process, if any, by which a non-resident beneficiary may seek a refund of the withholding tax, if applicable? 3) What forms or other documentation are required to be filed by the trustees and/or non-resident beneficiaries in respect of the distributions?

Position: 1) No. Withholding tax is generally not required on capital distributions of an estate where they are not distributions of estate income that would be subject to tax in the hands of a Canadian beneficiary, nor capital dividends that were derived or received by the estate; 2) n/a; 3) Executors and trustees are required to file NR4 form (Summary and slips) for the estate even where there is no requirement to withhold and remit Part XIII tax. Executors and trustees are also required to obtain a clearance certificate from CRA in respect of the estate.

Reasons: 1) Although 212(11) deems estate distributions to be distributions of income of the estate, 212(1)(c) withholding tax would not apply to ordinary capital distributions as they would not be amounts described in subparagraphs 212(1)(c)(i) or (ii); 2) n/a; 3) Regulation 202(1)(c) and NR4 Guide (T4061), 159(2).

Technical Interpretation - Internal

7 January 2026 Internal T.I. 2024-1007421I7 - Subsections 163(5) and (6) - multiple assessments

Unedited CRA Tags
163(5), 163(6)
a single assessment of the trust for a s. 163(6) penalty generally would be sufficient

Principal Issues: Whether more than one person can be assessed a penalty under subsection 163(5) with respect to a return of income for a taxation year of a trust required to be filed by subsection 150(1).

Position: While technically there is the authority to assess more than one person under the legislation, we consider the better view to be to assess the trust for the compliance infractions described in subsection 163(5).

Reasons: The scheme of the Act is to generally to assess penalties to enforce compliance under the Act, with one penalty being assessed with respect to the same failure. The enactment of subsections 163(5) and (6) appear to be to intended to allow for a more effective penalty to be assessed of the trust in the situations described than those that may have been assessed of the trust or its trustees under the previous legislation. Other provisions in the Act, such as subsection 159(1), 159(3) and 160(1) support the CRA in the ability to effectively enforce a penalty under subsections 163(5) and (6).