Principal Issues: Whether the CRA has the authority under the Act to reassess the taxation year of a corporation in which it paid an excessive capital dividend in order to reflect the corresponding changes resulting from the CRA’s acceptance of its subsection 184(3) election, including the deemed payment of a taxable dividend and possibly a dividend refund, if the taxation year is statute barred.
Position: Depends on the facts and circumstances.
Reasons: Generally speaking, if the corporation had previously filed a T2 return that reported a dividend refund (within the period required by subsection 129(1)), the Minister may redetermine that dividend refund to reflect the deemed taxable dividend resulting from the subsection 184(3) election provided that the normal redetermination period has not ended. If a dividend refund was not previously reported, the Minister may determine any amount of dividend refund, provided that the other necessary conditions of subsection 129(1) have been met. In any event, the correct amount of impacted balances should be used in subsequent taxation years under the New St. James principle.