Income Tax Severed Letters - 2025-10-15

Ruling

2025 Ruling 2022-0943251R3 - Application of 108(2)(b)(iii) and (iv)

Unedited CRA Tags
108(2)(b)
s. 108(2)(b) unit trust using a subsidiary LP to engage in hedging to offset hedging by an underlying fund investment, while avoiding net hedging gains for s. 108(2)(b)(iv) purposes

Principal Issues: 1) Whether units of a particular ETF would be considered a marketable security for purposes of clause 108(2)(b)(iii)(E)? 2) Whether income is computed on a net basis for purposes of subparagraph 108(2)(b)(iv) where the relevant income sources are held in a tiered partnership structure.

Position: 1) The particular units would qualify. 2) Opinion provided.

Reasons: 1) The law.

Technical Interpretation - External

18 June 2025 External T.I. 2025-1065871E5 - Behaviour Analysts in Ontario

Unedited CRA Tags
118.4, 118.4(2)

Principal Issues: Whether Behaviour Analysts in Ontario are authorized medical practitioners for purposes of the medical expense tax credit.

Position: Yes.

Reasons: There is specific legislation that governs the practice of Behavioural Analysts in Ontario.

Technical Interpretation - Internal

10 June 2025 Internal T.I. 2023-0970361I7 - Interpretation of “controlling persons” definition

Unedited CRA Tags
Income Tax Act section 270
look-through approach in determining controlling persons of stacked discretionary trusts

Principal Issues: (1) Would CRA consider any contributor to a trust as a “settlor” for the purposes of the definition “controlling persons” in subsection 270(1)? (2) In a hypothetical scenario where an underlying discretionary trust made distributions to the top discretionary trust in a particular calendar year, would CRA consider the discretionary beneficiaries of the top discretionary trust to be controlling persons of the underlying discretionary trust in that year? (3) In the same hypothetical scenario, if the underlying discretionary trust made a distribution to the top discretionary trust in a particular calendar year and the top discretionary trust made distributions to its discretionary beneficiaries in that same year, would the answer be the same?

Position: (1) It is a question of law to be determined in light of the relevant facts and circumstances; (2) A distribution from the underlying discretionary trust to the top discretionary trust would not result in the discretionary beneficiaries of the top discretionary trust becoming controlling persons in respect of any of the discretionary trusts; (3) A distribution to the top discretionary trust and a distribution from the top discretionary trust to its discretionary beneficiaries in the same year would result in the discretionary beneficiaries of the top discretionary trust becoming controlling persons in respect of both trusts in that calendar year.

Reasons: (1) Prior position; (2) Interpretation of law; (3) Interpretation of law and the Common Reporting Standard.