Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the CRA.
Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle de l'ARC.
Principal Issues: Whether NRCan can certify that the principal mineral to be extracted from the lithium-bearing spodumene deposits of the taxpayer will be a principal mineral extracted from a non-bedded deposit.
Position: Yes.
Reasons: Positive Opinion provided by NRCan.
XXXXXXXXXX 2023-098823
Olivier Bergeron
June 02, 2025
Dear XXXXXXXXXX:
Re: Mineral Resource Certification
This is in response to your email dated August 16, 2023, in which you requested on behalf of XXXXXXXXXX (the “Company”) certification pursuant to subparagraph (d)(i) of the definition “mineral resource” in subsection 248(1) of the Income Tax Act (the “Act”) with respect to the XXXXXXXXXX deposit (the “Deposit”) that is part of the XXXXXXXXXX Project (the “Project”), located in the XXXXXXXXXX.
The Project
The Project location is XXXXXXXXXX. The Project comprises XXXXXXXXXX contiguous mining claims (the “Property”) totalling approximately XXXXXXXXXX hectares. The claims are held by a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (XXXXXXXXXX). For a list of claims, see Appendix A.
Definition of Mineral Resource
In order for subparagraph (d)(i) of the definition of “mineral resource” in subsection 248(1) of the Act to apply, three conditions must be met:
1. a principal mineral must be extracted,
2. that mineral is an industrial mineral; and
3. that mineral is contained in a non-bedded deposit.
We obtained an opinion from the Minister of Natural Resources (“NRCan”) regarding the Deposit located on the Property. NRCan has advised us that the principal mineral to be extracted from the Deposit, XXXXXXXXXX. It is therefore our view that the Deposit will qualify as a “mineral resource” pursuant to subparagraph (d)(i) of the definition of this term in subsection 248(1) of the Act.
We note that nothing in this letter should be construed as implying that the CRA has confirmed, reviewed, made any determination, or accepted any method for the determination in respect of whether any proposed exploration expenses will be “Canadian exploration expenses”, “flow-through mining expenditures” or “flow-through critical mineral mining expenditures”, or whether any property will be a “Canadian resource property”, as those terms are defined in the Act.
Yours truly,
Kimberley Wharram
Manager
Resources Section
Reorganizations Division
Income Tax Rulings Directorate
Legislative Policy and Regulatory Affairs Branch
Appendix A – Mining Claims List
XXXXXXXXXX
All rights reserved. Permission is granted to electronically copy and to print in hard copy for internal use only. No part of this information may be reproduced, modified, transmitted or redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in a retrieval system for any purpose other than noted above (including sales), without prior written permission of Canada Revenue Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2025
Tous droits réservés. Il est permis de copier sous forme électronique ou d'imprimer pour un usage interne seulement. Toutefois, il est interdit de reproduire, de modifier, de transmettre ou de redistributer de l'information, sous quelque forme ou par quelque moyen que ce soit, de facon électronique, méchanique, photocopies ou autre, ou par stockage dans des systèmes d'extraction ou pour tout usage autre que ceux susmentionnés (incluant pour fin commerciale), sans l'autorisation écrite préalable de l'Agence du revenu du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.
© Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 2025
Email this Content