Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the CRA.
Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle de l'ARC.
Principal Issues: Follow-up to ITTN 44 and 2009 British Columbia Tax Conference. In the context of an estate freeze of a private corporation, does it continue to be the CRA's position that no premium will be applied to controlling non-participating preference shares issued to protect the economic interest of the freezor in the corporation?
Position: No change in position. Generally no control premium in circumstances described.
Reasons: Consistent with previous positions.
2020 CALU Round Table – July 2020
Question 7 - Valuation of Private Company Shares
Background
At the 2009 British Columbia tax conference the CRA stated:
"...non-participating controlling shares have some value and may therefore bear a premium. However, in the context of an estate freeze of a Canadian-controlled private corporation, where the freezor, as part of an estate freeze, keeps controlling non-participating preference shares in order to protect his economic interest in the corporation, the CRA generally accepts not to take into account any premium that could be attributable to such shares for the purposes of subsection 70(5) of the Income Tax Act at the freezor's death."
In ITTN-44, the CRA commented that, in the context of estate freezes of private corporations:
“Provided that the owners of all the shares of the corporation act in a manner consistent with the assumption that no value attaches to the voting rights, and the rights are eventually extinguished for no consideration, the CRA will generally not attribute value to the rights. If the holder of the rights uses them to run the corporation in conflict with the common shareholders or seeks or is offered consideration for them, it would be difficult for the CRA to ignore this evidence of value.”
Question
Can the CRA confirm its position as referenced above in relation to the valuation of non-participating controlling shares continues to be its position so that, in the circumstances outlined, no premium will be applied to the controlling shares?
Response
The positions stated at the 2009 British Columbia tax conference and in ITTN-44, described above, continue to reflect the CRA’s current policy.
Vicki Plant
July 8, 2020
2020-084225
All rights reserved. Permission is granted to electronically copy and to print in hard copy for internal use only. No part of this information may be reproduced, modified, transmitted or redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in a retrieval system for any purpose other than noted above (including sales), without prior written permission of Canada Revenue Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2020
Tous droits réservés. Il est permis de copier sous forme électronique ou d'imprimer pour un usage interne seulement. Toutefois, il est interdit de reproduire, de modifier, de transmettre ou de redistributer de l'information, sous quelque forme ou par quelque moyen que ce soit, de facon électronique, méchanique, photocopies ou autre, ou par stockage dans des systèmes d'extraction ou pour tout usage autre que ceux susmentionnés (incluant pour fin commerciale), sans l'autorisation écrite préalable de l'Agence du revenu du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.
© Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 2020
Email this Content