Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the CRA.
Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle de l'ARC.
Principal Issues: 1. Whether a taxable benefit would arise where an employer provides an automobile allowance to and reimburses certain meals and lodging expenses of employees that agree to work at a different work location.
Position: 1. Question of fact.
Reasons: 1. Travel between an employee's home and a regular place of employment (RPE) is personal travel. It is always a question of fact whether a particular location is a RPE for an employee. Employer-paid amounts or allowances for personal expenses are generally taxable as a benefit under either paragraph 6(1)(a) or 6(1)(b) of the Act.
XXXXXXXXXX
2012-043267
T. Baltkois
August 13, 2012
Dear XXXXXXXXXX:
Re: Taxable Benefits - Employee Travel Expenses
We are writing in response to your fax dated January 10, 2012, in which you requested our comments as to whether a taxable benefit would arise where an employer provides a travel allowance and reimburses certain employee expenses.
In the situation described, the employer has requested that employees, who regularly report for work and perform employment duties at a specific location (“1st location”), accept work shifts at a work site located in a different city (“2nd location”) due to a staff shortage at the 2nd location. An employee accepting work shifts at the 2nd location receives a per kilometre allowance for use of his or her own vehicle, the reimbursement of some meal costs and in rare circumstances, the reimbursement of lodging costs.
In general, travel between an employee's home and regular place of employment (“RPE”) is considered personal. Where an employee receives a reimbursement from, or is provided with an allowance by an employer in respect of personal or living expenses, the amount is generally taxable under paragraph 6(1)(a) or 6(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act (the “Act”), respectively, unless it falls within the exceptions listed in subparagraphs 6(1)(a)(i) to (v) or 6(1)(b)(i) to (ix) of the Act.
While it is always a question of fact whether a particular location is considered a RPE for an employee, it is the view of the Canada Revenue Agency that a particular location may be considered a RPE even though the employee may only report to work at that particular location on a periodic basis (e.g., once or twice a month) during the year. However, depending on the circumstances and facts, a location may not constitute a RPE for an employee if, for example, the employee works at that particular location only once during the year or perhaps for only a few days in the year.
Where an employee (as required by the employer or with the employer's concurrence) proceeds directly from home to a point of call other than the employee's RPE, or returns home from such a point, such travel is generally considered employment-related. In such situations, reasonable travel allowances provided to an employee for using his or her own vehicle in connection with or in the course of performing his or her employment duties and reimbursements made to an employee for reasonable meal and lodging costs incurred in such situations may not be a taxable benefit, provided that certain conditions are met. Please refer to Guide T4130, Employers’ Guide – Taxable Benefits and Allowances, for further guidance.
As noted, an employee's expenses for transportation from home to his or her RPE are personal expenses. However, subsection 6(6) of the Act provides an exemption for situations in which board and lodging and certain transportation expenses are paid by an employer in respect of employment at a "special work site" or a "remote work location". Interpretation Bulletin IT-91R4, Employment at Special Work Sites or Remote Work Locations, discusses the requirements that must be met to exclude from income the value of a benefit or reasonable allowance for board and lodging expenses and transportation to and from a particular work location. Based on the information you have provided, the 2nd location will not likely be considered a special work site or remote work location for the particular employees as it appears that they are not required to be at the 2nd location or away from their principal place of residence for at least 36 hours.
We trust these comments will be of assistance to you.
Yours truly,
Nerill Thomas-Wilkinson
Manager
for Director
Reorganizations Division
Income Tax Rulings Directorate
Legislative Policy and Regulatory Affairs Branch
All rights reserved. Permission is granted to electronically copy and to print in hard copy for internal use only. No part of this information may be reproduced, modified, transmitted or redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in a retrieval system for any purpose other than noted above (including sales), without prior written permission of Canada Revenue Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2012
Tous droits réservés. Il est permis de copier sous forme électronique ou d'imprimer pour un usage interne seulement. Toutefois, il est interdit de reproduire, de modifier, de transmettre ou de redistributer de l'information, sous quelque forme ou par quelque moyen que ce soit, de facon électronique, méchanique, photocopies ou autre, ou par stockage dans des systèmes d'extraction ou pour tout usage autre que ceux susmentionnés (incluant pour fin commerciale), sans l'autorisation écrite préalable de l'Agence du revenu du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.
© Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 2012