Income Tax Severed Letters - 2008-09-12

Ruling

2008 Ruling 2007-0239871R3 - Post butterfly transactions

Unedited CRA Tags
55(3.1)(c); 55(3)(b)

Principal Issues: Whether the sale of partnership units results in paragraph 55(3.1)(c) denying the butterfly exemption.

Position: Paragraph 55(3.1)(c) is not applicable.

2008 Ruling 2007-0255241R3 - Entity Classification

Unedited CRA Tags
248(1)

Principal Issues: Whether the proposed XXXXXXXXXX cooperative will be treated as a corporation for purposes of the Act.

Position: Yes.

Reasons: The provisions of the foreign legislation and the articles creating the cooperative support the conclusion that this cooperative will be treated as a corporation for purposes of the Act.

2007 Ruling 2006-0187861R3 - Internal Reorganization

Unedited CRA Tags
55(3)(a) 80 13(7)(e) 13(21)

Principal Issues: 1. Whether 55(2) applies to recharacterize intercorporate dividends arising on share redemptions. 2. Application of debt forgiveness rules on settlement of contingent debt.

Position: 1. Subsection 55(2) will apply to recharacterize intercorporate dividends as proceeds of disposition. Department of Finance has issued comfort letter to address problem.

Reasons: 1. The prior takeover of Target by Parent and the post- acquisition of control reorganization transactions are part of the same series of transactions by virtue of subsection 248(10). Consequently, under the current legislation, there was a disposition of property to an unrelated party as described in subparagraph 55(3)(a)(i) due to the application of paragraph 55(3.01)(e) as well as significant increases in interest in corporations by unrelated parties as described in subparagraph 55(3)(a)(ii).

Technical Interpretation - External

26 August 2008 External T.I. 2008-0273351E5 - Employee Travel Allowances

Unedited CRA Tags
6(1)(c) 6(1)(b)(vii.1) 81(3.1)

Principal Issues: Are the per diem amounts and the per-kilometre mileage allowances received by the members of the XXXXXXXXXX committee taxable?

Position: Per diems are taxable as income from an office. The taxability of the mileage allowance must be determined on a case-by-case basis.

Reasons: The law.

XXXXXXXXXX 2008-027335
Michael Cooke
August 26, 2008

Conference

9 September 2008 Roundtable, 2008-0270531C6 - 2008 CALU Question 5, SDAs and pensions

Unedited CRA Tags
248(1)

Principal Issues: Would certain provisions support the conclusion that an arrangement is a SERP and not an SDA?

Position: A number of factors need to be considered in determining whether a particular plan is a SERP or an SDA.

Reasons: An SDA includes an arrangement under which a person has a right to receive an amount after the end of the year and it is reasonable to consider that one of the reasons for the establishment of the right is to postpone tax payable on an amount of employment income the person would otherwise have received in the year. Hence, if an employer creates any form of plan that provides such a right and the employment income that an employee would otherwise receive is reduced as a consequence of the creation of the arrangement, then the arrangement could be an SDA.
The definition of an SDA excludes the treatment of certain types of arrangements, including registered pension plans, as SDAs but does not exclude unregistered pension plans. However, the CRA has previously stated that a plan will not be treated as an SDA where the plan has the characteristics of an unregistered or supplementary pension plan and the amounts that may be paid out of or under the plan can be considered to be reasonable superannuation or pension benefits. When a plan provides benefits that are not reasonable superannuation or pension benefits, the CRA is of the view that an SDA will exist. Accordingly, to determine if a particular arrangement is an SDA, all of the terms of the particular arrangement must be considered.