Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the CRA.
Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle de l'ARC.
Principal Issues: How is paragraph (b) of the definition of specified investment applied
Position: Generally, it is necessary to have 6 full-time employees
Reasons: Historically, the courts have adopted a strict interpretation of Subsection 125(7) and have required 6 full-time employees in order for a corporation to be outside the definition of a specified investment business
2004-010177
XXXXXXXXXX Charles Rafuse
613-957-8967
August 12, 2005
Dear XXXXXXXXXX:
Re: Definition of Specified Investment Business
This is in reply to your letter of October 25, 2004, concerning the definition of a "specified investment business" contained in Subsection 125(7) of the Income Tax Act (the "Act").
Specifically, you have asked how paragraph (b) of the definition should be applied. Paragraph (b) indicates that a specified investment business does not include a business carried on by a corporation where any other corporation associated with the corporation provides, in the course of carrying on an active business, managerial, administrative, financial, maintenance or other similar services to the corporation in the year and the corporation could reasonably be expected to require more than 5 full-time employees if those services had not been provided.
Historically, the courts have adopted a strict interpretation of Subsection 125(7) and have required 6 full-time employees in order for a corporation to be outside the definition of a specified investment business. The CCRA has followed this court interpretation and currently requires corporations claiming this exclusion to have 6 full-time employees. Accordingly, in applying paragraph (b) we would consider whether the managerial services provided to a corporation by an associated corporation would have required 6 full-time employees.
The best indication that the test in paragraph (b) has been met is where the associated corporation has 6 or more full-time employees and it could be verified that 6 of these employees spent all their time in providing managerial services to the corporation under consideration. Another situation where the test has been met would be where full-time employees spent a portion of their time in providing managerial services and these portions added up to the equivalent of 6 full-time employees. It is possible that there may be situations where the associated corporation had fewer than 6 full-time employees and some part-time employees and the test under paragraph (b) could be met but we would expect that this would not be very frequent.
We trust this information is helpful.
Yours truly,
Charles Rafuse
For Director
Business and Partnerships Division
Income Tax Rulings Directorate
Policy and Planning Branch
All rights reserved. Permission is granted to electronically copy and to print in hard copy for internal use only. No part of this information may be reproduced, modified, transmitted or redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in a retrieval system for any purpose other than noted above (including sales), without prior written permission of Canada Revenue Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2005
Tous droits réservés. Il est permis de copier sous forme électronique ou d'imprimer pour un usage interne seulement. Toutefois, il est interdit de reproduire, de modifier, de transmettre ou de redistributer de l'information, sous quelque forme ou par quelque moyen que ce soit, de facon électronique, méchanique, photocopies ou autre, ou par stockage dans des systèmes d'extraction ou pour tout usage autre que ceux susmentionnés (incluant pour fin commerciale), sans l'autorisation écrite préalable de l'Agence du revenu du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.
© Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 2005