Docket:
2014-1187(IT)G
BETWEEN:
LUC POIRIER,
Appellant,
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
Respondent.
[ENGLISH TRANSLATION]
Appeal heard with the appeals of
Estelle Cormier, 2014-1188(IT)G, and Centre du radiateur des Îles inc.,
2014-1818(IT)I, on September 12 and 13, 2016, at Îles-de-la-Madeleine, Quebec.
Before:
The Honourable Justice Johanne D’Auray
Appearances:
|
Counsel for the Appellant:
|
Jean Yanakis
|
|
Counsel for the Respondent:
|
Dominique Gallant
|
JUDGMENT
The
appeal from the reassessments issued under the Income Tax Act
("ITA") for the 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 taxation years is
allowed, without costs, and the reassessments are referred back to the Minister
of National Revenue for review and reassessment based on the agreement between
the parties, to the effect that:
a) For the
2005 taxation year:
- The
taxable income of $80,378 shall be reduced by $27,000.
b) For the
2006 taxation year:
- The
taxable income of $77,678 shall be reduced by $36,243.
c) For the
2007 taxation year:
- The
taxable income of $88,904 shall be reduced by $53,008.
d) For the
2008 taxation year:
- The
taxable income of $64,830 shall be reduced by $33,833.
The
penalties under subsection 163(2) of the ITA shall be adjusted on the basis of
the appellant’s new taxable income for the 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 taxation
years.
For
all other purposes, the reassessments as previously established shall remain
unchanged.
Signed at Ottawa, Canada,
this 14th day of October 2016.
“Johanne D’Auray”
Translation certified true
On this 21st day of June 2017.
François Brunet, Reviser
Docket:
2014-1188(IT)G
BETWEEN:
ESTELLE
CORMIER,
Appellant,
and
HER
MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
Respondent.
[ENGLISH
TRANSLATION]
Appeal
heard on common evidence with the appeals of Luc Poirier, 2014-1187(IT)G, and
Centre du radiateur des Îles inc., 2014-1818(IT)I, on September 12 and 13,
2016, at Îles-de-la-Madeleine, Quebec.
Before:
The Honourable Justice Johanne D’Auray
Appearances:
|
Counsel for
the Appellant:
|
Jean Yanakis
|
|
Counsel for
the Respondent:
|
Dominique Gallant
|
JUDGMENT
The
appeal from the reassessments issued under the Income Tax Act
("ITA") for the 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 taxation years is
allowed, without costs, and the reassessments are referred back to the Minister
of National Revenue for review and reassessment on the basis of the agreement
between the parties, to the effect that:
a) For the 2006 taxation year:
- The
taxable income of $46,069 shall be reduced by $5,838.
b) For the
2007 taxation year:
- The
taxable income of $130,721 shall be reduced by $36,243.
c) For the
2008 taxation year:
- The
taxable income of $93,584 shall be reduced by $28,274.
The penalties under subsection 163(2) of the ITA shall
be adjusted based on the appellant’s new taxable income for the 2006, 2007 and
2008 taxation years.
For all other purposes, the reassessments as previously established
shall remain unchanged.
Signed at Ottawa,
Canada, this 14th day of October 2016.
“Johanne D’Auray”
Translation certified true
On this 21st day of June 2017.
François Brunet, Reviser
Docket:
2014-1818(IT)I
BETWEEN:
CENTRE
DU RADIATEUR DES ÎLES INC.,
Appellant,
and
HER
MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
Respondent.
[ENGLISH
TRANSLATION]
Appeal
heard on common evidence with the appeals of Luc Poirier, 2014-1187(IT)G, and
Estelle Cormier, 2014-1188(IT)G, on September 12 and 13, 2016, at
Îles-de-la-Madeleine, Quebec.
Before:
The Honourable Justice Johanne D’Auray
Appearances:
|
Counsel for
the Appellant:
|
Jean Yanakis
|
|
Counsel for
the Respondent:
|
Dominique Gallant
|
JUDGMENT
The
appeal of the reassessments issued under the Income Tax Act
("ITA") for the 2006, 2007 and 2008 taxation years is allowed,
without costs, and the reassessments are referred back to the Minister of
National Revenue for review and reassessment on the basis of the agreement
between the parties, to the effect that:
a) For the 2006 taxation year:
- The
income of $59,522 added by the minister as unreported income shall be reduced
by $27,536.
b) For the
2007 taxation year:
- The
income of $64,432 added by the minister as unreported income shall be reduced
by $59,433.
c) For the
2008 taxation year:
- The
income of $101,022 added by the minister as unreported income shall be reduced
by $87,061.
The
penalties under subsection 163(2) of the ITA shall be adjusted based on the
appellant’s new income for the 2006, 2007 and 2008 taxation years.
For all other purposes, the reassessments as previously
established shall remain unchanged.
Signed at Ottawa,
Canada, this 14th day of October 2016.
“Johanne D’Auray”
Translation certified true
On this 21st day of June 2017.
François Brunet, Reviser
Citation:
2016 CCI 231
Date: 20161014
Docket: 2014-1187(IT)G
BETWEEN:
LUC
POIRIER,
Appellant,
and
HER
MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
Respondent,
Docket:
2014-1188(IT)G
AND BETWEEN:
ESTELLE
CORMIER,
Appellant,
and
HER
MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
Respondent,
Docket:
2014-1818(IT)I
AND BETWEEN:
CENTRE
DU RADIATEUR DES ÎLES INC.,
Appellant,
and
HER
MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
Respondent.
[ENGLISH
TRANSLATION]
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
D’Auray J.
[1]
At the hearing, the parties settled the appeals
as follows:
I. Appeal
by Luc Poirier, 2014-1187(IT)G
[2]
Under this settlement, the Minister of National
Revenue ("minister") shall issue reassessments on the basis of the
following:
a) For the 2005 taxation year:
- The taxable income of $80,378
shall be reduced by $27,000.
b) For the 2006 taxation year:
- The taxable income of $77,678
shall be reduced by $36,243.
c) For the 2007 taxation year:
- The taxable income of $88,904
shall be reduced by $53,008.
d) For the 2008 taxation year:
- The taxable income of $64,830
shall be reduced by $33,833.
[3]
In issuing these reassessments for the 2005,
2006, 2007 and 2008 taxation years, the minister shall adjust the penalties
assessed under subsection 163(2) of the Income Tax Act ("ITA")
taking into account the reductions in the appellant’s taxable income as listed
in paragraphs 2a), 2b), 2c) and 2d) of these reasons.
II. Appeal
by Estelle Cormier, 2014-1188(IT)G
[4]
Under this settlement, the minister shall issue
reassessments on the basis of the following:
a) For the 2006 taxation year:
- The taxable income of $46,069
shall be reduced by $5,838.
b) For the 2007 taxation year:
- The taxable income of $130,721
shall be reduced by $36,243.
c) For the 2008 taxation year:
- The taxable income of $93,584
shall be reduced by $28,274.
[5]
In issuing these reassessments for the 2006,
2007 and 2008 taxation years, the minister shall adjust the penalties assessed
under subsection 163(1) of the ITA taking into account the reductions in the
appellant’s taxable income as listed in paragraphs 4a), 4b) and 4c) of these
reasons.
III. Appeal
by Centre du radiateur des Îles inc., 2014-1818(IT)I
[6]
Under this settlement, the minister shall issue
reassessments on the basis of the following:
a) For the 2006
taxation year:
- The
income of $59,522 added by the minister as unreported income shall be reduced
by $27,536.
b) For the 2007
taxation year:
- The
income of $64,432 added by the minister as unreported income shall be reduced
by $59,433.
c) For the 2008
taxation year:
- The
income of $101,022 added by the minister as unreported income shall be reduced
by $87,061.
[7]
In issuing these reassessments for the 2006,
2007 and 2008 taxation years, the minister shall adjust the penalties assessed
under subsection 163(2) of the ITA taking into account the reductions in the
appellant’s income as listed in paragraphs 6a), 6b) and 6c) of these reasons.
[8]
These cases were scheduled for hearings on
September 12, 13 and 14, 2016, at Îles-de-la-Madeleine.
[9]
At the start of the first day of the hearing, the
parties requested time to discuss the cases.
[10]
After two days of discussion, the parties
reached a settlement in all three cases, except for costs.
[11]
In these cases, the minister issued
reassessments for several items. In Luc Poirier’s case, the minister issued a
reassessment adding amounts to his income for the taxable benefits and
unreported capital gains. The minister also annulled a loss carryover and set
penalties under subsection 163(2) of the ITA.
[12]
In the case of Centre du Radiateur des Îles
inc., the minister issued a reassessment of the company’s unreported income and
interest. She also set penalties under subsection 163(2) of the ITA for the
2006, 2007 and 2008 taxation years.
[13]
In Estelle Cormier’s case, the minister issued a
reassessment adding amounts to her income for the taxable benefits and set
penalties under subsection 163(2) of the ITA.
[14]
The respondent is asking for costs to be granted
to it for all three cases: those of Luc Poirier and Estelle Cormier under
Tariff A of the Tax Court of Canada Rules, General Procedure
("Rules") and that of Centre du radiateur des Îles inc.,
(2014-1818(IT)I), under subsection 10(2) of the Tax Court of Canada Rules,
Informal Procedure ("Rules, Informal Procedure").
[15]
In short, the respondent says that if it had
received all the documents before the hearing, it is very likely that the cases
would have been resolved long before the dates of the hearing, and its
preparations for this dispute could have been avoided. It also noted that there
were delays in these cases, since the notices of appeal did not comply with
Court Rules. Extensions of time were also requested for the production
of the lists of documents.
[16]
Counsel for the appellants says that the cases
have not been unduly delayed in his time as counsel of record. He notes that he
had to review the cases. In addition, this Court granted the requests to extend
the deadline to file the lists of documents for the appeals filed under the
general procedure. It took his clients a lot of time and effort to find the documents
relevant to the cases. Moreover, Mr. Poirier and Ms. Cormier work long hours,
which made it harder for them to find documents.
[17]
This Court may only grant costs to the
respondent in an informal procedure if an appellant’s actions unduly delayed
the quick and efficient settlement of the appeal. I am of the opinion that the
respondent has not established that Centre du radiateur des Îles inc. unduly
delayed the settlement of its appeal before this Court. Consequently, costs
should not be granted to the respondent in this case.
[18]
In Luc Poirier and Estelle Cormier’s cases, I am
of the opinion that from the time the appellants were represented by counsel,
the Rules were followed. In these cases, so many items were assessed
that a settlement conference would really have been the best way to reach a
settlement.
The advantage of a settlement conference is that all the parties come together
not only to provide documents, but also to explain the contents of these
documents. In this case, none of the parties requested a settlement conference.
It is possible, as counsel for the respondent submits, that if all the
documents had been provided in advance, the cases could have been settled long
before the hearing. Indeed, if the appellants had asked for costs to be granted
to them, I would have refused. However, in the light of my reading of the
cases, I am of the opinion that the respondent has not established that costs
should be granted to it.
Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 14th day of October 2016.
“Johanne D’Auray”
Translation certified true
On this 21st day of June 2017.
François
Brunet, Reviser
|
CITATION:
|
2016 CCI 231
|
|
COURT FILE
NO.:
|
2014-1187(IT)G
2014-1188(IT)G
2014-1818(IT)I
|
|
STYLE OF
CAUSE:
|
LUC POIRIER v HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
ESTELLE CORMIER
v HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
CENTRE DU
RADIATEUR DES ÎLES INC. v HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
|
|
PLACE OF
HEARING:
|
Îles-de-la-Madeleine, Quebec
|
|
DATE OF
HEARING:
|
September 12 and 13, 2016
|
|
REASONS FOR
JUDGMENT BY:
|
The Honourable Justice Johanne D’Auray
|
|
DATED:
|
October 14, 2016
|
APPEARANCES:
|
Counsel for the Appellants:
|
Jean Yanakis
|
|
Counsel for
the Respondent:
|
Dominique Gallant
|
COUNSEL OF RECORD:
For the Appellants:
|
Name:
|
Jean Yanakis
|
|
Firm:
|
|
|
For the Respondent:
|
William F. Pentney
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Ottawa, Canada
|