Docket: A-267-14
Citation: 2014 FCA 259
|
CORAM:
|
NOËL C.J.
GAUTHIER J.A.
BOIVIN J.A.
|
|
BETWEEN:
|
|
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
|
|
Applicant
|
|
and
|
|
ANTHONY SCHOOLCRAFT
|
|
Respondent
|
Heard at Montréal, Quebec, on November 5, 2014.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Montréal, Quebec, on November
5, 2014.
|
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
|
BOIVIN
J.A.
|
Docket: A-267-14
Citation:
2014 FCA 259
|
CORAM:
|
NOËL C.J.
GAUTHIER J.A.
BOIVIN J.A.
|
|
BETWEEN:
|
|
|
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
|
|
|
Applicant
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
ANTHONY SCHOOLCRAFT
|
|
|
Respondent
|
|
|
|
|
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Montréal, Quebec, on November 5, 2014).
BOIVIN J.A.
[1]
Despite the forceful argument of counsel for the
applicant, we have not been persuaded that the Canada Agricultural Review
Tribunal committed a reviewable error.
[2]
It was open to the Tribunal to conclude as it
did, on the basis of the evidence on record. What we are being asked to do is
to conduct a trial de novo and
reach the opposite conclusion. This is not the role of this Court.
[3]
The application for judicial review will be
dismissed.
“Richard Boivin”
FEDERAL
COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES
OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
|
DOCKET:
|
A-267-14
|
|
STYLE OF CAUSE:
|
ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF CANADA v. ANTHONY SCHOOLCRAFT
|
|
PLACE OF
HEARING:
|
Montréal, Quebec
|
|
DATE OF
HEARING:
|
November 5, 2014
|
|
REASONS
FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
|
NOËL C.J.
GAUTHIER J.A.
BOIVIN J.A.
|
|
DELIVERED
FROM THE BENCH BY:
|
BOIVIN J.A.
|
APPEARANCES:
|
Dominique Guimond
|
For The
Applicant
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
|
William F. Pentney
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Ottawa, Ontario
|
For The
Applicant
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
|
Email this Content