Docket: A-398-14
Citation: 2015 FCA 147
CORAM:
|
NOËL C.J.
SCOTT J.A.
BOIVIN J.A.
|
BETWEEN:
|
MICHEL G.
DESCHÊNES
|
Appellant
|
and
|
HER MAJESTY THE
QUEEN
|
Respondent
|
Heard
at Montréal, Quebec, on June 17, 2015.
Judgement delivered from the Bench at Montréal, Quebec, on June 17,
2015.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
|
SCOTT
J.A.
|
Docket: A-398-14
Citation: 2015 FCA 147
CORAM:
|
NOËL C.J.
SCOTT J.A.
BOIVIN J.A.
|
BETWEEN:
|
MICHEL G.
DESCHÊNES
|
Appellant
|
and
|
HER MAJESTY THE
QUEEN
|
Respondent
|
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF
THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Montréal,
Quebec, on June 17, 2015)
SCOTT J.A.
[1]
This is an appeal from a decision rendered by
Justice Jorré of the Tax Court of Canada (the TCC judge) confirming an assessment
issued by the Minister of National Revenue denying the deduction of legal fees
for the amount of $21,609.00 in the computation of the appellant’s income for
the 2011 taxation year. The TCC judge had to determine whether the
appellant could deduct the legal fees he had incurred for a Superior Court
proceeding in computing his income.
[2]
In his decision, the TCC judge concluded that
the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 1 (5th Supp.), did
not allow the appellant to deduct these expenses as legal fees because he
incurred them to establish a right and the expenses therefore constituted a
capital expenditure, which cannot be deducted under paragraph 18(1)(b)
of the Act. The TCC judge also determined that these legal fees were not
incurred for the purpose of gaining or producing income from property under paragraph 18(1)(a),
thus also making them ineligible, especially as the appellant, in his capacity
as executor, was seeking damages for another taxpayer.
[3]
This appeal cannot be allowed as the appellant
has failed to satisfy us that the TCC judge committed a palpable or other error
in reviewing the nature of the expenses incurred in legal fees by the
appellant. We have nothing to add to the reasons provided by the TCC judge.
Like him, and for the same reasons, we fail to see how the claimed deduction
can be considered to have been incurred to gain or produce an income for the
purposes of paragraphs 18(1)(a) and (b) of the Income Tax
Act.
[4]
The appeal will be dismissed with costs.
“A.F. Scott”
Translation
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
SOLICITORS
OF RECORD
DOCKET:
|
A-398-14
|
STYLE OF CAUSE:
|
MICHEL G.
DESCHÊNES v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
|
|
PLACE OF HEARING:
|
Montréal, Quebec
|
DATE OF HEARING:
|
June 17, 2015
|
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
OF THE COURT BY:
|
NOËL C.J.
SCOTT J.A.
BOIVIN J.A.
|
DELIVERED
FROM THE BENCH BY:
|
SCOTT J.A.
|
|
|
|
|
APPEARANCES:
Michel G. Deschênes
|
For the
appellant
(on his own behalf)
|
Anne-Marie Boutin
|
For the
respondent
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
William F. Pentney
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
|
For the
respondent
|