Date: 20040121
Docket: A-66-03
Citation: 2004 FCA 25
CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A.
SEXTON J.A.
MALONE J.A.
BETWEEN:
WILTON INDUSTRIES CANADA LIMITED
Appellant
and
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
Heard at Montréal, Quebec, on January 21, 2004.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Montréal, Quebec, on January 21, 2004.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A.
Date: 20040121
Docket: A-66-03
Citation: 2004 FCA 25
CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A.
SEXTON J.A.
MALONE J.A.
BETWEEN:
WILTON INDUSTRIES CANADA LIMITED
Appellant
and
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(Delivered from the Bench at Montréal, Quebec, on January 21, 2004)
ROTHSTEIN J.A.
[1] Despite the able argument of counsel for the appellant, having regard to the method of a reasonableness analysis set out in Law Society of New Brunswick v. Ryan, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 247, we have not been persuaded that the decision of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal is unreasonable.
[2] The appeal will be dismissed with costs.
"Marshall Rothstein"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-66-03
STYLE OF CAUSE:
WILTON INDUSTRIES CANADA LIMITED
v.
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, Quebec
DATE OF HEARING: January 21, 2004
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
OF THE COURT: (ROTHSTEIN, SEXTON and MALONE JJ.A.)
RENDERED FROM THE BENCH
BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A.
APPEARANCES:
|
Mr. Peter Kirby
|
FOR THE APPELLANT
|
|
Mr. Jan Brongers
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
|
Fasken Martineau DuMoulin
Montréal, Quebec
|
FOR THE APPELLANT
|
|
Morris Rosenberg
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|
Email this Content