Date:
20070430
Docket: A-412-06
Citation: 2007 FCA 175
CORAM: LÉTOURNEAU J.A.
EVANS J.A.
SHARLOW J.A.
BETWEEN:
JOSEPH
GEORGE ZADOR
Appellant
and
HER
MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
Heard at Vancouver,
British Columbia, on April 30, 2007.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia, on April 30, 2007.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
SHARLOW J.A.
Date:
20070430
Docket: A-412-06
Citation: 2007
FCA 175
CORAM: LÉTOURNEAU
J.A.
EVANS
J.A.
SHARLOW
J.A.
BETWEEN:
JOSEPH GEORGE
ZADOR
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY
THE QUEEN
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE
COURT
(Delivered
from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia, on April 30, 2007)
SHARLOW J.A.
[1]
This
is an appeal of a judgment of the Tax Court of Canada (2006 TCC 545) dismissing
the appellants’ income tax appeal for 2004.
[2]
The
issue is whether the Tax Court Judge was correct when he concluded that a
moving expense is deductible under subsection 62(1) of the Income Tax Act,
R.S.C. 1985, c. 1 (5th supp.) only when it is paid. The relevant
parts of subsection 62(1) reads as follows (my emphasis):
62.
(1) […] there may be deducted amounts paid by the taxpayer as or on
account of moving expenses incurred in the course of moving from the old
residence to the new residence […].
|
62.
(1) […] il peut déduire […] les sommes qu’il a payées au titre des
frais de déménagement engages pour déménager de son ancienne residence pour
venire occuper sa nouvelle residence […]
|
[3]
Mr.
Zador argues that a moving expense is deductible when the taxpayer incurs a
legal obligation to pay it. The Tax Court Judge did not accept Mr. Zador’s
interpretation. He concluded that subsection 62(1) requires that a moving
expense be paid before it is eligible for a deduction under that provision. We
agree with him. In our view, the words of subsection 62(1) cannot reasonably
bear the interpretation proposed by Mr. Zador.
[4]
This
appeal will be dismissed with costs.
“K.
Sharlow”
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-412-06
STYLE OF CAUSE: JOSEPH GEORGE ZADOR v. HMQ
PLACE OF
HEARING: Vancouver, British
Columbia
DATE OF
HEARING: April
30, 2007
REASONS FOR
JUDGMENT BY: LÉTOURNEAU
J.A.
EVANS J.A.
SHARLOW
J.A.
DELIVERED
FROM THE BENCH BY: SHARLOW
J.A.
DATED: April 30, 2007
APPEARANCES:
Joseph George Zador ON HIS OWN BEHALF
Sara Fairbridge FOR
THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS
OF RECORD:
|
|
John H. Sims,
Q.C.
Deputy
Attorney General of Canada
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|