Date: 20071105
Docket: A-342-06
Citation: 2007 FCA 357
BETWEEN:
DR.
NOEL AYANGMA
Appellant
and
THE
TREASURY BOARD OF CANADA
Respondent
and
PUBLIC SERVICE LABOUR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent
ASSESSMENT OF
COSTS - REASONS
Charles E. Stinson
Assessment Officer
[1]
The
Appellant formally abandoned this appeal of a decision of the Federal Court
requiring security for costs. The Court dismissed with costs the Appellant's
motion for a stay of the Federal Court's decision. I issued a timetable for
written disposition of the assessment of the bill of costs of the Respondent,
the Treasury Board of Canada (the Respondent), addressing the motion for a
stay.
[2]
The
Appellant did not file any materials in response to the Respondent's materials.
My view, often expressed in comparable circumstances, is that the Federal
Courts Rules do not contemplate a litigant benefiting by having an
assessment officer step away from a neutral position to act as the litigant's
advocate in challenging given items in a bill of costs. However, the assessment
officer cannot certify unlawful items, i.e. those outside the authority of the
judgment and the tariff. I examined each item claimed in the bill of costs
and the supporting materials within those parameters. The total amount claimed is
generally arguable as reasonable in the circumstances and is allowed as
presented at $875.00 plus $240.00 (the minimum counsel fee allowance under item
26 for assessment of costs) for a total of $1,115.00
"Charles
E. Stinson"
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-342-06
STYLE OF CAUSE: DR.
NOEL AYANGMA v. THE TREASURY BOARD OF CANADA et al.
ASSESSMENT
OF COSTS IN WRITING WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF THE PARTIES
REASONS FOR
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: CHARLES E.
STINSON
DATED: November 5,
2007
WRITTEN
REPRESENTATIONS:
|
n/a
|
FOR THE APPELLANT
(self-represented)
|
|
Mr. Richard E.
Fader
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|
SOLICITORS
OF RECORD:
|
n/a
|
FOR THE APPELLANT
|
|
John H. Sims,
Q.C.
Deputy
Attorney General of Canada
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|