Date: 20110309
Docket: A-267-10
Citation: 2011 FCA
91
CORAM: BLAIS C.J.
SHARLOW J.A.
STRATAS J.A.
BETWEEN:
DANISH
HAROON PEER
Appellant
and
THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP
AND IMMIGRATION
Respondent
Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on March 9, 2011.
Judgment delivered from the
Bench at Toronto,
Ontario, on March 9, 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: BLAIS
C.J.
Date: 20110309
Docket: A-267-10
Citation: 2011 FCA 91
CORAM: BLAIS
C.J.
SHARLOW
J.A.
STRATAS
J.A.
BETWEEN:
DANISH HAROON PEER
Appellant
and
THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP
AND IMMIGRATION
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE
COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario on March 9, 2011)
BLAIS C.J.
[1]
Despite the able submissions of counsel for the Appellant, we have not been
persuaded that Justice Zinn erred in his interpretation of the word “espionage”
in subsection 34(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C.
2001, c. 27. On the contrary, we agree with his decision, substantially for the
reasons he gave.
[2]
The
certified question is:
Is a person
inadmissible to Canada for “engaging in an act of espionage … against a
democratic government, institution or process” within the meaning of subsection
section 34(1)(a) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, if the
person’s activities consist of intelligence gathering activities that are legal
in the country where they take place, do not violate international law and
where there is no evidence of hostile intent against the persons who are being
observed?
[3]
We would
answer yes to this question.
[4]
Counsel
conceded that, given that answer, there is no basis for appellate intervention.
[5]
The appeal
will be dismissed.
“Pierre Blais”
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-267-10
(APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF THE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ZINN, DATED JULY 19, 2010, IN FEDERAL COURT FILE NO.
IMM-5147-09)
STYLE OF CAUSE: DANISH
HAROON PEER v.
THE MINISTER OF
CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario
DATE OF HEARING: March 9, 2011
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
OF THE COURT BY: (BLAIS C.J., SHARLOW & STRATAS JJ.A.)
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: BLAIS C.J.
APPEARANCES:
Jacqueline
Swaisland
|
FOR THE APPELLANT
|
Ladan
Shahrooz
Hillary Stephenson
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Waldman &
Associates
|
FOR THE
APPELLANT
|
Myles J.
Kirvan
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
|
FOR THE
RESPONDENT
|