Date: May 17, 2011
Docket: A-230-10
Citation: 2011 FCA 170
CORAM: BLAIS C.J.
SHARLOW J.A.
LAYDEN-STEVENSON J.A.
BETWEEN:
ISABELLE
ARCAND
Appellant
and
ABIWIN
CO-OPERATIVE INC.
Respondent
Heard at Ottawa,
Ontario, on May 17, 2011.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on May 17, 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: LAYDEN-STEVENSON
J.A.
Date: May 17,
2011
Docket:
A-230-10
Citation: 2011
FCA 170
CORAM: BLAIS
C.J.
SHARLOW
J.A.
LAYDEN-STEVENSON
J.A.
BETWEEN:
ISABELLE
ARCAND
Appellant
and
ABIWIN CO-OPERATIVE
INC.
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE
COURT
(Delivered
from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on May 17, 2011)
LAYDEN-STEVENSON
J.A.
[1] This is an appeal from the judgment of Justice O’Keefe of
the Federal Court (2010 FC 529) dismissing the appellant’s application under
section 14 of the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents
Act, S.C. 2000, c. 5.
[2] Despite
the able and articulate submissions of Ms. Arcand, we are of the view that the
appeal must be dismissed. The judge identified the correct legal principles and
applied them to interpret the parties’ settlement agreement in the context of
the underlying facts. It is not the function of an appellate court to determine
the weight to be assigned to the evidence. Although Justice O’Keefe did not
accept the appellant’s evidence, he did not ignore it. We see no error of law
or principle, or any palpable or overriding error of fact in the judge’s
analysis. There is nothing that warrants our intervention.
[3] Consequently,
the appeal will be dismissed.
“Carolyn
Layden-Stevenson”
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-230-10
STYLE OF CAUSE: ARCAND
v ABIWIN CO-OPERATIVE INC.
PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa,
Ontario
DATE OF HEARING: May 17, 2011
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE
COURT BY: BLAIS C.J., SHARLOW and LAYDEN-STEVENSON JJ.A.
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: LAYDEN-STEVENSON J.A.
APPEARANCES:
|
Self-Represented
|
FOR
THE APPELLANT
|
|
Marc Charron
Lisanne
McCullough
|
FOR
THE RESPONDENT
|
SOLICITORS
OF RECORD:
|
|
FOR THE APPELLANT
|
|
Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
Ottawa, Ontario
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|