Date: 20110906
Docket: A-64-11
Citation: 2011 FCA 243
CORAM: NADON J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
MAINVILLE J.A.
BETWEEN:
SAIPEM
UK LIMITED
Appellant
and
HER
MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
Heard at Montréal,
Quebec, on September 6,
2011.
Delivered
from the Bench at Montréal, Quebec, on September 6, 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: NADON
J.A.
Date: 20110906
Docket:
A-64-11
Citation: 2011 FCA 243
CORAM: NADON
J.A.
TRUDEL
J.A.
MAINVILLE
J.A.
BETWEEN:
SAIPEM UK
LIMITED
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY
THE QUEEN
Respondent
REASONS FOR
JUDGMENT
NADON J.A.
[1]
Notwithstanding
Mr. Lefebvre’s forceful arguments, we have not been persuaded that the
judge made any error which would allow us to intervene.
[2]
More
particularly, with regard to article 22(1) of the Canada – United
Kingdom Tax Convention (the Tax Treaty), we are all of the view,
substantially for the reasons given by the judge, that the provisions of the Income
Tax Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. 1 (5th Supp.) as amended, at issue
discriminate on the basis of residency and not nationality and, as a result, do
not constitute discrimination against the Appellant under the Tax Treaty. With
regard to article 22(2) of the Tax Treaty, we are all of the view, also
for the reasons given by the judge, that the provisions at issue do not
constitute less favourable treatment of the Appellant.
[3]
In
the end, Mr. Lefebvre’s argument, in effect, is that Canada should not
be allowed, in the particular circumstances of this case, to discriminate
against the Appellant on the basis of residency. Unfortunately, there is
nothing in the Tax Treaty to support that view.
[4]
Consequently,
the appeal will be dismissed with costs in favour of the Respondent.
“M.
Nadon”
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-64-11
STYLE OF CAUSE: SAIPEM
UK LIMITED
v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, Quebec
DATE OF HEARING: September
6, 2011
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: NADON,
TRUDEL, MAINVILLE JJA.
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: NADON
J.A.
DATED: September
6, 2011
APPEARANCES:
Wilfrid
Lefebvre
|
FOR
THE APPELLANT
|
Natalie
Goulard
Christina
Ham
|
FOR
THE RESPONDENT
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Norton
Rose OR LLP
Montréal,
Quebec
|
FOR
THE APPELLANT
|
Myles
J. Kirvan
Deputy
Attorney General of Canada
|
FOR
THE RESPONDENT
|