Date:
20120910
Docket:
A-473-11
Citation:
2012 FCA 232
CORAM: NADON
J.A.
SHARLOW
J.A.
TRUDEL
J.A.
BETWEEN:
ELI LILLY CANADA INC.,
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY,
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY LIMITED
and ELI LILLY SA
Appellants
And
NOVOPHARM
LIMITED
Respondent
Heard
at Toronto, Ontario, on September 10, 2012.
Judgment
delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on September 10, 2012.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
BY: NADON J.A.
Date:
20120910
Docket:
A-473-11
Citation:
2012 FCA 232
CORAM: NADON
J.A.
SHARLOW
J.A.
TRUDEL
J.A.
BETWEEN:
ELI LILLY CANADA INC.,
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY,
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY LIMITED
and ELI LILLY SA
Appellants
And
NOVOPHARM
LIMITED
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
OF THE COURT
(Delivered
from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on September 10, 2012)
[1]
Despite
the able submissions of counsel for the appellant, we have not been persuaded
that the judgment under appeal is based on any error of law or principle or any
palpable and overriding error of fact.
[2]
This
appeal will be dismissed with costs.
“M. Nadon”
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-473-11
STYLE OF CAUSE: Eli
Lilly Canada Inc. & al
v. Novopharm Limited
PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario
DATE OF HEARING: September
10, 2012
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON
J.A.
SHARLOW J.A.
TRUDEL
J.A.
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: NADON
J.A.
APPEARANCES:
|
Anthony G. Creber
Cristin A. Wagner
Livia Aumand
|
FOR THE APPELLANTS
|
|
Jonathan Stainsby
Andrew Skodyn
Neil Fineberg
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
|
Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
Ottawa, Ontario
|
FOR THE
APPELLANTS
|
|
Heenan Blaikie LLP
Toronto, Ontario
|
FOR THE
RESPONDENT
|
Email this Content