Docket: T-1839-15
Citation:
2016 FC 259
Toronto, Ontario, February 29, 2016
PRESENT: The
Honourable Mr. Justice Barnes
|
BETWEEN:
|
|
TY INC.
|
|
Plaintiff
|
|
and
|
|
PROMOTIONS C.D.
INC.
|
|
Defendant
|
JUDGMENT AND REASONS
[1]
UPON THE
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION for judgment against the Defendant read this day;
[2]
AND UPON reading
the Motion Record of the Plaintiff and the consent of the parties, filed;
JUDGMENT
1.
THIS COURT’S JUDGMENT is that as between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, without admission of
liability or infringement, the Defendant shall:
(a)
immediately cease all importation into Canada
and the offering for sale and sale, either directly or indirectly, of BEANIE
BOOS plush toys as depicted in Schedule “B” hereto which bear the distinctive
trade-mark shape designs of the Plaintiff as depicted in schedule “A” (the
BEANIE BOOS Plush Toys); and
(b)
immediately cease all making, importing for sale
into Canada, distribution, selling, exposing or offering for sale, exhibiting
in public or parting with possession of unauthorized copies, in whole or
substantial part, either directly or indirectly, of the BEANIE BOOS Plush Toys;
(c)
as Ty, Inc. may elect, either destroy or deliver
up to Ty, Inc. all BEANIE BOOS Plush Toys or unauthorized copies within its
possession; and
(d)
within 10 days of the date of issuance of the
Judgment in this action:
1)
disclose the identity of the Chinese
manufacturer(s) and/or any other manufacturers or distributors who sold the
infringing products to Promotions C.D.; and
2)
deliver up to Ty, Inc. any documentation
exchanged between Promotions C.D. and the Chinese manufacturer(s) one the on
hand, and/or any other manufacturers or distributors on the other hand, who
sold the infringing products to Promotions C.D., including but not limited to
marketing materials, invoices, customs declarations, shipping information,
communications, etc.
2.
The whole without costs.
“R.L. Barnes”
FEDERAL
COURT
SOLICITORS
OF RECORD
|
Docket:
|
T-1839-15
|
|
|
STYLE OF CAUSE:
|
TY INC. v PROMOTIONS C.D. INC.
|
|
|
|
|
considered
at toronto, ontario pursuant to rule 369
|
JUDGMENT
AND REASONS:
|
BARNES J.
|
|
DATED:
|
FEBRUARY 29, 2016
|
WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY:
|
Kenneth D. McKay
|
For
The Plaintiff
|
|
Pascal Lauzon
|
For
The Defendant
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
|
SIM ASHTON & McKAY LLP
Solicitors & Barristers
Toronto, Ontario
|
For
The Plaintiff
|
|
BCF Business Law
Montréal, Québec
|
For
The Defendant
|