Docket:
T-1237-13
Citation:
2014 FC 359
Toronto, Ontario, April 14, 2014
PRESENT: The
Honourable Mr. Justice Hughes
BETWEEN:
|
PATTERNED CONCRETE INDUSTRIES, INC. AND PATTERNED CONCRETE ONTARIO
INC.
|
Plaintiffs
|
and
|
JOSE LUIS HORTA
|
Defendant
|
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT
[1]
The Plaintiffs have brought a motion in writing,
ex parte, for judgment against the Defendant, no Defence or other
document has been filed by the Defendant.
[2]
Service on the Defendant, an individual person,
was effected by Registered Mail. The record indicated that the Defendant signed
a receipt thus service was effected under Rule 128(1)(e). Further the record
contains a letter from the Defendant sent by Registered Mail to the Plaintiffs’
solicitors stating:
“To clarify matters, all business cards and any other advertisements
for Peel Concrete with the wording, patterned concrete, have been destroyed and
in the future will never be used again.”
[3]
In view of the foregoing there is no basis for
an injunction or delivery up.
[4]
As to damages the Plaintiffs have filed the
Affidavit of Guido which only speculates as to damages, and speaks only in
general terms. No actual damages have been proven. The fact that another Judge
may have given damages of $24,000.00 in a similar case is not a basis for
seeking similar or greater damages here. That Judge may have had a different
record. Damages must be proved, generalizations are insufficient. I will award
nominal damages of $1,000.00.
[5]
I will award costs in the amount requested as
the record satisfies me that they are appropriate.
JUDGMENT
UPON EX PARTE
MOTION by Patterned Concrete Industries, Inc. and
Patterned Concrete Ontario Inc. (Plaintiffs) for judgment against Jose Luis
Horta (Defendant):
AND FOR THE
REASONS GIVEN;
THIS COURT’S JUDGMENT is that:
1.
This Court grants a declaration that the
Defendant has infringed the Plaintiffs’ rights in the registered trade-mark
PATTERNED CONRETE, registration no. TMA256184;
2.
This Court grants damages in the amount of $1,000.00
for trade-mark infringement, depreciation of the goodwill in the registered
trade-mark PATTERNED CONCRETE and activity contrary to Section 7(b) of the Trade-marks
Act;
3.
This Court grants the costs in the proceeding in
the amount of $1,954.95.
“Roger T. Hughes”
FEDERAL
COURT
SOLICITORS
OF RECORD
DOCKET:
|
T-1237-13
|
STYLE OF CAUSE:
|
PATTERNED CONCRETE INDUSTRIES, INC. AND
PATTERNED CONCRETE ONTARIO INC. v.
JOSE LUIS HORTA
|
REASONS
FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT:
|
HUGHES J.
|
DATED:
|
April 14, 2014
|
APPEARANCES:
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
AND JUDGMENT WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF THE PARTIES
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Michael Adams
RICHES, McKENZIE & HERBERT LLP
|
For
The PLAINTIFFS
|
N/A
Self-Represented
|
For
The DEFENDANT
(Self-Represented)
|