Date: 20070306
Docket: T-473-06
Citation: 2007
FC 253
Ottawa, Ontario,
March 6, 2007
PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice O'Keefe
BETWEEN:
ALLAN
JAY GORDON
Plaintiff
and
HER
MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA
Defendant
Docket: T-474-06
BETWEEN:
JAMES A. DEACUR & ASSOCIATES LTD. and
JAMES ALLAN DEACUR
Plaintiffs
-
and –
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA
Defendant
REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER
O’KEEFE J.
[1]
This is a
motion by Her Majesty the Queen in right of Canada (the defendant) for:
1.
An order
declaring that any taxpayer information – as defined in subsection 241(10) of
the Income Tax Act (the
Act)– in the possession of the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), the Department of
Justice Federal Prosecution Services (FPS) and their respective agents,
relevant to the within action, may be released by CRA officials, Department of
Justice FPS officials and their agents, to counsel for the defendant in the
within action, as may be necessary to defend the action, to permit the Crown to
make full answer and defence on the merits of the action, and for the purposes
of preparing a statement of defence, affidavit of documents, and examinations
for discovery as the Federal Court Rules require, and that disclosing
such taxpayer information (by CRA officials, Department of Justice FPS
officials and their agents) to inform counsel for the defendant, is not a
violation of subsection 241(1) of the Act and is permitted by paragraph
241(3)(b) of the Act and/or authorized in these circumstances by paragraph
8(2)(b) and/or paragraph 8(2)(d) of the Privacy Act.
2.
An order
declaring that the within action constitutes, under paragraph 241(3)(b) of the
Act, a “legal proceeding
related to the administration and enforcement” of the Act.
3.
An order
declaring that any taxpayer information to be received by counsel for the
defendant for the purpose of
defending this action may subsequently be released by counsel for the defendant
to counsel for the plaintiffs or this Honourable Court, as may be required to
comply with the Federal Court Rules, and that such release is not
prohibited, as such release fits within the exception to the prohibition on the
release of taxpayer information under paragraph 241 (3)(b) of the Act and would
thereby not be in violation of the Act.
4.
An order
declaring that CRA officials, Department of Justice FPS officials and their
respective agents are
authorized to release taxpayer information, as required, to inform counsel for
the defendant, and to permit counsel for the defendant to fully defend the
action on the merits, by virtue of paragraph 8(2)(d) of the Privacy Act,
since the release of such taxpayer information is required for the purpose of
defending an action involving the Crown in right of Canada, or by virtue of
paragraph 8(2)(b) of the Privacy Act, which permits disclosure for any
purpose in accordance with any act of Parliament or any regulation thereunder
which authorizes its disclosure.
5.
An order
declaring that the release of any taxpayer information by CRA and Department
of Justice FPS officials and their
respective agents:
(a) to permit counsel to prepare a
statement of defence as required by Rule 204 of the
Federal Court Rules, and to deliver an affidavit
of documents as required by Rule 223 of the Federal Court Rules;
(b) to answer questions at
examination for discovery as required by Rule 236 of the
Federal Court Rules; and
(c) otherwise in the conduct of
the litigation,
is not a violation of law, and
in particular, but not limited to , is not a violation of section 241 of the
Act, as the release of such information comes within the exception under
paragraph 241(3)(b) of the Act, and is, if necessary, authorized by paragraphs
8(2)(b) and/or 8(2)(d) of the Privacy Act.
6. In the alternative, an
order adjourning this motion to permit notice of this motion to be given
to each of the relevant
taxpayers, the identities of whom are to be provided by the plaintiffs, as this
is within the knowledge of the plaintiffs, and/or such further order as this
Honourable Court may consider just, in order to facilitate the seeking of the
consent of the said taxpayers, or to permit them an opportunity to make
submissions in this motion without violating the law.
- An order extending the time to
deliver the statement of defence until such time as counsel
for the defendant is able to obtain,
review and consider the necessary information to fully defend on the merits.
- Such further order or direction as
this Honourable Court deems appropriate.
- Such further and other relief as
requested and as this Court deems just.
The Parties
[2]
The corporate
plaintiff, James A. Deacur & Associates Ltd. (hereinafter JAD) is a company
incorporated pursuant to the laws of Canada, carrying on business as
principally an accounting firm specializing in tax consulting, with its
principal place of business in the city of Concord, in the province of Ontario,
with additional offices in Georgetown and Orangeville.
[3]
The
plaintiff, James Allan Deacur (hereinafter Deacur) resides in the town of King City and is the majority shareholder of JAD.
[4]
The
plaintiff, Allan Jay Gordon (hereinafter Gordon) resides in the City of Vaughan and is a shareholder of JAD.
He is a chartered accountant and has been in practice since 1979. Gordon has
been with JAD for approximately 18 years. Gordon specializes in accounting and
tax consulting in reference to scientific research and experimental
development.
[5]
The
defendant, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada is vicariously liable for
the actions of Revenue Canada and its employees and agents.
For all matters forming the subject matter of this dispute, the Canada Revenue
Agency is the successor federal department of Revenue Canada and retains liability for all tortious
actions of its predecessor federal department. Either or both of these federal
departments may hereinafter be referred to as CRA.
[6]
The
plaintiffs have issued statements of claim against the defendant. The plaintiff
, Allan Jay Gordon, claims the following:
|
(a)
|
Intentional interference with economic
relations
|
$
3,650,000
|
|
(b)
|
Pecuniary
damages for
(i)
lost billable hours
(ii)
legal fees incurred for criminal defence
|
$
1,000,000
$
90,000
|
|
(c)
|
Non-pecuniary
damages for
(i)
defamation
(ii)
fraud male fide
(iii)
pain and suffering
|
$
1,000,000
$
1,000,000
$
1,000,000
|
|
(d)
|
Punitive,
aggravated and exemplary damages for:
(i)
gross abuse of public office
(ii)
Charter violations by government officials
(iii)
abuse of process
(iv)
wrongful summons
|
$10,000,000
$
3,000,000
$
3,000,000
$
2,000,000
|
|
(e)
|
Pre-
and post-judgment interest in accordance with the provisions of the Federal
Courts Act, R.S. 1985, c. F-7 and amendments thereto
|
|
|
(f)
|
The
costs of this action on a substantial indemnity scale
|
|
|
(g)
|
Such
further and other relief as this Honourable Court may deem just
|
|
[7]
The
plaintiffs, James A. Deacur & Associates Ltd. and James Allan Deacur claim
the following:
|
(a)
|
Intentional interference with economic
relations
|
$
15,000,000
|
|
(b)
|
Pecuniary
damages for
(i)
decreased asset value of goodwill
(i)
lost billable hours
(ii)
legal fees incurred for criminal defence
|
$
4,000,000
$
1,000,000
$
620,000
|
|
(c)
|
Non-pecuniary
damages for
(i)
defamation
(ii)
fraud male fide
(iii)
pain and suffering
|
$
2,000,000
$
2,000,000
$
2,000,000
|
|
(d)
|
Punitive,
aggravated and exemplary damages for:
(i)
gross abuse of public office
(ii)
Charter violations by government officials
(iii)
abuse of process
(iv)
wrongful summons
|
$20,000,000
$
6,000,000
$
3,000,000
$
3,000,000
|
|
(e)
|
Pre-
and post-judgment interest in accordance with the provisions of the Federal
Courts Act, R.S. 1985, c. F-7 and amendments thereto
|
|
|
(f)
|
The
costs of this action on a substantial indemnity scale
|
|
|
(g)
|
Such
further and other relief as this Honourable Court may deem just
|
|
[8]
As noted,
the defendant is seeking a declaration essentially stating that the relevant
taxpayer information can be released pursuant to paragraph 241(3)(b) of the Income
Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 1 (5th Supplement) and paragraph 8(2)(b) or
8(2)(d) of the Privacy Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. P-21. The plaintiffs do not
disagree that these sections apply to the taxpayer information in this case.
[9]
The
underlying actions arise out of the alleged handling of claims filed for
clients by the plaintiffs relating to claims for tax credits under the federal
government’s Scientific Research and Experimental Development Program.
[10]
The
defendant submits that it needs materials from the Department of Justice files,
which include taxpayer information, in order to file a statement of defence.
The Department of Justice will not release the information in light of section
241 of the Income Tax Act.
[11]
There is
no doubt that taxpayer information is at issue in this case. Consequently, it
will be necessary to determine whether paragraph 241(3)(b) applies so as to
make subsections 241(1) and 241(2) inapplicable. If paragraph 241(3)(b) does
not apply, the information cannot be released.
[12]
Paragraph
241(3)(b) states that subsections 241(1) and (2) (the confidentiality
provisions) do not apply “ . . . in respect of any legal proceedings relating to
the administration or enforcement of this Act. . . . “ What meaning is to be
given to these words? Is the exemption only to apply when the proceedings taken
are proceedings specifically provided for under the Income Tax Act?
Justice Iacobucci of the Supreme Court of Canada in Slattery (Trustee of) v. Slattery,
[1993] 3 S.C.R. 430 stated at pages 445 to 447:
3. The Text and
Context of s. 241(3)
20. As already noted, s.
241(3) provides, inter alia, that the confidentiality provisions in s.
241(1) and (2) do not apply "in respect of proceedings relating to the
administration or enforcement of" the Income Tax Act. The
appellant argues that the only proceedings covered by this exception are those
which are expressly provided for in Part XV of the Act, entitled "Administration
and Enforcement". The appellant's argument would require the words in s.
241(3) to be read as meaning that the confidentiality provisions do not apply
"in respect of proceedings taken pursuant to the administration or
enforcement provisions" of the Income Tax Act. Neither
the text nor context of s. 241 supports this argument.
21.
The connecting phrases used by Parliament in s. 241(3) are very
broad. The confidentiality provisions are stated not to apply in
respect of proceedings relating to the administration or enforcement of the Income
Tax Act.
22. The phrase "in
respect of" was considered by this Court in Nowegijick v. The
Queen, [1983] 1 S.C.R. 29, at p. 39:
The words
"in respect of" are, in my opinion, words of the widest possible
scope. They import such meanings as "in relation to",
"with reference to" or "in connection with". The phrase
"in respect of" is probably the widest of any expression intended to
convey some connection between two related subject matters. [Emphasis added.]
In my view, these comments are
equally applicable to the phrase "relating to". The
Pocket Oxford Dictionary (1984) defines the word
"relation" as follows:
. . . what
one person or thing has to do with another, way in which one stands or is
related to another, kind of connection or correspondence or contrast or feeling
that prevails between persons or things; . . .
So, both the connecting phrases
of s. 241(3) suggest that a wide rather than narrow view should be taken when
considering whether a proposed disclosure is in respect of proceedings relating
to the administration or enforcement of the Income Tax Act.
. . .
25.
The next question to ask considers what type of administration or enforcement
proceedings are contemplated by s. 241(3): only proceedings brought
under the Income Tax Act itself, or both such proceedings and
others? To answer this question, one must look first to the wording
of s. 241(3). That provision contains no language which confines the concept of
proceedings relating to administration or enforcement to the boundaries of the Income
Tax Act. This conclusion is buttressed when one considers the
context of s. 241.
[13]
The
Supreme Court of Canada has indicated that a wide view should be taken when
determining whether a proposed disclosure is in respect of a proceeding
relating to the enforcement or administration of the Income Tax Act. The
Court went further and ruled that it not only encompassed administration or
enforcement proceedings taken under the Income Tax Act itself, but also
other proceedings taken relating to the enforcement or administration of the Income
Tax Act.
[14]
Justice
Sharlow of the Federal Court of Appeal in Harris v. R., [2001] 2
C.T.C. 148 (F.C.A.), when dealing with subsection 241(3) of the Income Tax
Act stated at page 153:
15. The identity of the taxpayer that
obtained the 1991 ruling is clearly "taxpayer information" within the
meaning of section 241 of the Income Tax Act. The question is
whether the action commenced by Mr. Harris is a legal proceeding "relating
to the administration or enforcement" of the Income Tax Act.
16. As explained
above, the subject matter of the action is an advance income tax
ruling. The Minister issued that ruling as part of the
administration of the Income Tax Act. Mr. Harris commenced
this proceeding to establish that the issuance of that ruling was not a proper
administrative act. In that sense this proceeding "relates
to" the administration of the Income Tax Act. Therefore,
the words of paragraph 241(3)(b) are broad enough to cover this proceeding.
17. However, counsel for the Crown argues
for a narrower interpretation of paragraph 241(3)(b). He argues that
because the Minister is the only person who is authorized to administer and
enforce the Income Tax Act, only a legal proceeding undertaken by or on
behalf of the Minister for the purpose of the administration or enforcement of
the Income Tax Act can be within the scope of paragraph
241(3)(b). The Minister is arguing, in essence, that a legal proceeding
that seeks to uncover improper administration of the Income Tax Act
cannot be said to be related to its administration. This argument seems to
me illogical and I am unable to accept it.
This
jurisprudence also shows that a broad meaning should be given to what is encompassed
by the phrase “relating to the administration or enforcement” of the Income
Tax Act.
[15]
I am of
the view that subsection 241(3) of the Income
Tax Act applies to these
proceedings and as a result, the confidentiality provisions of subsections
241(1) and (2) do not apply.
[16]
Paragraphs
8(2)(b) and (d) of the Privacy Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. P-21
The Privacy Act applies to both the CRA
and the Department of Justice FPS. Section 3 of the Privacy Act gives a
wide meaning to personal information and states that personal information is
“information about an identified individual that is recorded in any form” (see Canada
(Information Commissioner) v. Canada (Commissioner of the R.C.M.P.),
[2003] 1 S.C.R. 66 at pages 81 and 82). I am satisfied that at least some of
the information in question is personal information.
[17]
Subsection
8(1) of the Privacy Act states that personal information under the
control of a government institution shall not be released without the consent
of the person to whom it relates unless allowed to be released under section 8.
[18]
I am of
the view that paragraphs 8(2)(b) and (d) of the Privacy Act clearly
allow the release of the information in question, as the actions taken by the
plaintiffs are clearly legal actions involving the Crown in the Right of
Canada. Also, paragraph 8(2)(b) contemplates the release of information allowed
by subsection 241(3) of the Income Tax Act.
[19]
Notice
to Third Parties Whose Taxpayer Information is being Released
There is no requirement under the Income Tax
Act that third parties be given notice that their tax information will be
released. However, this does not mean that some type of advance notice should
not be given to the taxpayer. I am of the opinion that some type of advance
notice should be given to the taxpayer. Based on the information available to
me on this hearing, I am not prepared to dictate the form of notice. I would,
however, direct the parties to the statements of Justice Phelan in Scott
Slipp Nissan Ltd v. Canada (Attorney General), [2005] G.S.T.C. 70,
2005 FC 1479 at paragraphs 15 and 16 where he stated:
15. It was appropriate for the Minister to
give notice to third parties and to provide them respectively with their
confidential information that was to be released. The principles of fairness
generally would require this procedure as these third parties may have rights
or interests affected by the Minister's decision to disclose.
16. The Minister
has provided no justification for disclosing the Applicant's name and the
existence of the tax dispute. A notice of intended release could simply state
that the Minister has concluded that it was reasonably necessary for purposes
of the Act to make the disclosure and provide the third party with copies of
the intended disclosure.
[20]
The
defendant indicated at the hearing that it is not pursuing a stay of
proceedings.
[21]
I find
that:
1. Subject to the defendant giving
notice to any affected taxpayer of the intended release of their taxpayer information,
an order shall issue declaring any taxpayer information – as defined in
subsection 241(1) of the Income Tax Act – in the possession of the CRA,
the Department of Justice FPS and their respective agents, relevant to the
within action, may be released by CRA officials, Department of Justice FPS
officials and their agents, to counsel for the defendant in the within action,
as may be necessary to defend the action, to permit the Crown to make full
answer and defence on the merits of the action, and for the purposes of
preparing a statement of defence, affidavit of documents, and examinations for
discovery as the Federal Courts Rules require, and that disclosing such
taxpayer information (by CRA officials, Department of Justice FPS officials and
their agents) to inform counsel for the defendant, is not a violation of
subsection 241(1) of the Income Tax Act and is permitted by paragraph
241(3)(b) of the Income Tax Act, and/or authorized in these
circumstances by paragraph 8(2)(b) and/or paragraph 8(2)(d) of the Privacy
Act.
2. The defendant should be granted an
order declaring that the within action constitutes, under paragraph 241(3)(b)
of the Income Tax Act, a “legal proceeding related to the administration
and enforcement” of the Income Tax Act.
3. The defendant should be granted an
order declaring that any taxpayer information to be received by counsel for the
defendant for the purpose of defending this action may subsequently be released
by counsel for the defendant to counsel for the plaintiffs or this Honourable
Court, as may be required to comply with the Federal Courts Rules and
that such release is not prohibited, as such release fits within the exception
to the prohibition on the release of taxpayer information under paragraph
241(3)(b), and would thereby not be in violation of the Income Tax Act.
4. Subject to the defendant giving
notice to any affected taxpayer of the intended release of their taxpayer information,
an order shall issue declaring that CRA officials, Department of Justice FPS
officials and their respective agents are authorized to release taxpayer
information, as required, to inform counsel for the defendant, and to permit
counsel for the defendant to fully defend the action on the merits, by virtue
of paragraph 8(2)(d) of the Privacy Act, since the release of such
taxpayer information is required for the purpose of defending an action
involving the Crown in right of Canada, or by virtue of paragraph 8(2)(b) of
the Privacy Act, which permits disclosure for any purpose in accordance
with any Act of Parliament or any Regulation thereunder which authorizes its
disclosure.
5. The defendant should be granted an
order declaring that the release of any taxpayer information by CRA and
Department of Justice FPS officials and their respective agents:
(a) to permit counsel to
prepare a statement of defence as required by Rule 204 of the Federal Courts
Rules, and to deliver an affidavit of documents as required by Rule 223 of
the Federal Courts Rules;
(b) to answer questions at
examination for discovery as required by Rule 236 of the Federal Courts
Rules; and
(c) otherwise in the conduct
of the litigation,
is not a violation of law, and in particular, but not
limited to, is not a violation of section 241 of the Income Tax Act, as
the release of such information comes within the exception under paragraph
241(3)(b) of the Income Tax Act, and is, if necessary, authorized by
paragraphs 8(2)(b) and/or 8(2)(d) of the Privacy Act.
[22]
The
defendant shall also be granted an extension, extending the time to deliver the
statement of defence until such time as counsel for the defendant is able to
obtain, review and consider the necessary information to fully defend on the
merits. Either party may apply to the Court to set a time frame for the
delivery of the defence.
[23]
The
parties shall be allowed to make submissions to me with respect to the issue of
costs.
ORDER
[24]
IT IS
ORDERED that:
1. Subject to the defendant giving
notice to any affected taxpayer of the intended release of their taxpayer
information, an order shall issue declaring any taxpayer information – as
defined in subsection 241(1) of the Income Tax Act – in the possession
of the CRA, the Department of Justice FPS and their respective agents, relevant
to the within action, may be released by CRA officials, Department of Justice
FPS officials and their agents, to counsel for the defendant in the within
action, as may be necessary to defend the action, to permit the Crown to make
full answer and defence on the merits of the action, and for the purposes of
preparing a statement of defence, affidavit of documents, and examinations for
discovery as the Federal Courts Rules require, and that disclosing such
taxpayer information (by CRA officials, Department of Justice FPS officials and
their agents) to inform counsel for the defendant is not a violation of
subsection 241(1) of the Income Tax Act, and is permitted by
paragraph 241(3)(b) of the Income Tax Act and/or authorized in these
circumstances by paragraph 8(2)(b) and/or paragraph 8(2)(d) of the Privacy
Act.
2. An order declaring that the within
action constitutes, under paragraph 241(3)(b) of the Income Tax Act, a
“legal proceeding related to the administration and enforcement” of the Income
Tax Act.
3. An order declaring that any taxpayer
information to be received by counsel for the defendant for the purpose of
defending this action may subsequently be released by counsel for the defendant
to counsel for the plaintiffs or this Honourable Court, as may be required to
comply with the Federal Courts Rules and that such release is not
prohibited, as such release fits within the exception to the prohibition on the
release of taxpayer information under paragraph 241(3)(b), and would thereby
not be in violation of the Income Tax Act.
4. Subject to the defendant giving
notice to any affected taxpayer of the intended release of their taxpayer information,
an order shall issue declaring that CRA officials, Department of Justice FPS
officials and their respective agents are authorized to release taxpayer
information, as required, to inform counsel for the defendant, and to permit
counsel for the defendant to fully defend the action on the merits, by virtue
of paragraph 8(2)(d) of the Privacy Act, since the release of such
taxpayer information is required for the purpose of defending an action
involving the Crown in right of Canada, or by virtue of paragraph 8(2)(b) of
the Privacy Act, which permits disclosure for any purpose in accordance
with any Act of Parliament or any Regulation thereunder which authorizes its
disclosure.
5. An order declaring that the release
of any taxpayer information by CRA and Department of Justice FPS officials and
their respective agents:
(a) to permit counsel to
prepare a statement of defence as required by Rule 204 of the Federal Courts
Rules, and to deliver an affidavit of documents as required by Rule 223 of
the Federal Courts Rules;
(b) to answer questions at
examination for discovery as required by Rule 236 of the Federal Courts
Rules; and
(c) otherwise in the conduct
of the litigation,
is not a violation of law, and in particular, but not
limited to, is not a violation of section 241 of the Income Tax Act, as
the release of such information comes within the exception under paragraph
241(3)(b) of the Income Tax Act, and is, if necessary, authorized by paragraphs
8(2)(b) and/or 8(2)(d) of the Privacy Act.
6. An order extending the time to
deliver the statement of defence until such time as counsel for the defendant
is able to obtain, review and consider the necessary information to fully
defend on the merits. Either party may apply to the Court to set a time frame
for the delivery of the defence.
7. The parties may make submissions with
respect to costs to me and I retain jurisdiction to make a ruling on costs.
“John
A. O’Keefe”
ANNEX
Relevant Statutory Provisions
The following provisions of the Income Tax
Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 1 (5th Supp.) are relevant to this motion.
|
239.(2.2)
Every person who
(a)
contravenes subsection 241(1), or
(b) knowingly
contravenes an order made under subsection 241(4.1)
is guilty of
an offence and liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding $5,000 or
to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months, or to both.
241.(1) Except
as authorized by this section, no official shall
(a) knowingly provide,
or knowingly allow to be provided, to any person any taxpayer information;
(b) knowingly
allow any person to have access to any taxpayer information; or
(c) knowingly
use any taxpayer information otherwise than in the course of the
administration or enforcement of this Act, the Canada Pension Plan, the
Unemployment Insurance Act or the Employment Insurance Act or for the purpose
for which it was provided under this section.
241.(2)
Notwithstanding any other Act of Parliament or other law, no official shall
be required, in connection with any legal proceedings, to give or produce
evidence relating to any taxpayer information.
241.(3)
Subsections 241(1) and 241(2) do not apply in respect of
(a) criminal
proceedings, either by indictment or on summary conviction, that have been
commenced by the laying of an information or the preferring of an indictment,
under an Act of Parliament; or
(b) any legal
proceedings relating to the administration or enforcement of this Act, the
Canada Pension Plan, the Unemployment Insurance Act or the Employment
Insurance Act or any other Act of Parliament or law of a province that
provides for the imposition or collection of a tax or duty.
. . .
241.(4) An
official may
(a) provide to
any person taxpayer information that can reasonably be regarded as necessary
for the purposes of the administration or enforcement of this Act, the Canada
Pension Plan, the Unemployment Insurance Act or the Employment Insurance Act,
solely for that purpose;
241.(10) . . .
"official"
means any person who is employed in the service of, who occupies a position
of responsibility in the service of, or who is engaged by or on behalf of,
(a) Her
Majesty in right of Canada or a province, or
(b) an
authority engaged in administering a law of a province similar to the Pension
Benefits Standards Act, 1985,
or any person
who was formerly so employed, who formerly occupied such a position or who
was formerly so engaged and, for the purposes of subsection 239(2.21),
subsections 241(1) and 241(2), the portion of subsection 241(4) before
paragraph (a), and subsections 241(5) and 241(6), includes a designated
person;
"taxpayer
information" means information of any kind and in any form relating to
one or more taxpayers that is
(a) obtained by
or on behalf of the Minister for the purposes of this Act, or
(b) prepared
from information referred to in paragraph 241(10) taxpayer information (a),
but does not
include information that does not directly or indirectly reveal the identity
of the taxpayer to whom it relates.
|
239.(2.2)
Commet une infraction et encourt, sur déclaration de culpabilité par
procédure sommaire, une amende maximale de 5 000 $ et un emprisonnement
maximal de 12 mois, ou l'une de ces peines, toute personne:
a)
soit qui contrevient au paragraphe 241(1);
b)
soit qui, sciemment, contrevient à une ordonnance rendue en application du
paragraphe 241(4.1).
241.(1)
Sauf autorisation prévue au présent article, il est interdit à un
fonctionnaire:
a)
de fournir sciemment à quiconque un renseignement confidentiel ou d'en
permettre sciemment la prestation;
b)
de permettre sciemment à quiconque d'avoir accès à un renseignement
confidentiel;
c)
d'utiliser sciemment un renseignement confidentiel en dehors du cadre de
l'application ou de l'exécution de la présente loi, du Régime de pensions du
Canada, de la Loi sur l'assurance-chômage ou de la Loi sur
l'assurance-emploi, ou à une autre fin que celle pour laquelle il a été
fourni en application du présent article.
241.(2)
Malgré toute autre loi ou règle de droit, nul fonctionnaire ne peut être
requis, dans le cadre d'une procédure judiciaire, de témoigner, ou de
produire quoi que ce soit, relativement à un renseignement confidentiel.
241.(3)
Les paragraphes (1) et (2) ne s'appliquent:
a)
ni aux poursuites criminelles, sur déclaration de culpabilité par procédure
sommaire ou sur acte d'accusation, engagées par le dépôt d'une dénonciation
ou d'un acte d'accusation, en vertu d'une loi fédérale;
b)
ni aux procédures judiciaires ayant trait à l'application ou à l'exécution de
la présente loi, du Régime de pensions du Canada, de la Loi sur
l'assurance-chômage ou de la Loi sur l'assurance-emploi ou de toute autre loi
fédérale ou provinciale qui prévoit l'imposition ou la perception d'un impôt,
d'une taxe ou d'un droit.
. .
.
241.(4)
Un fonctionnaire peut:
a)
fournir à une personne un renseignement confidentiel qu'il est raisonnable de
considérer comme nécessaire à l'application ou à l'exécution de la présente
loi, du Régime de pensions du Canada, de la Loi sur l'assurance-chômage ou de
la Loi sur l'assurance-emploi, mais uniquement à cette fin;
241.(10)
. . .
"fonctionnaire"
Personne qui est ou a été employée par la personne ou l'administration
suivante, qui occupe ou a occupé une fonction de responsabilité au service
d'une telle personne ou administration ou qui est ou a été engagée par une
telle personne ou administration ou en son nom:
a)
Sa Majesté du chef du Canada ou d'une province;
b)
une administration chargée de l'application d'une loi provinciale semblable à
la Loi de 1985 sur les normes de prestation de pension.
Pour
l'application du paragraphe 239(2.21), des paragraphes (1) et (2), du passage
du paragraphe (4) précédant l'alinéa a) et des paragraphes (5) et (6), une
personne déterminée est assimilée à un fonctionnaire.
"renseignement
confidentiel" Renseignement de toute nature et sous toute forme
concernant un ou plusieurs contribuables et qui, selon le cas:
a)
est obtenu par le ministre ou en son nom pour l'application de la présente
loi;
b)
est tiré d'un renseignement visé à l'alinéa a).
N'est
pas un renseignement confidentiel le renseignement qui ne révèle pas, même
indirectement, l'identité du contribuable en cause.
|
The
following provisions of the Privacy Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. P-21 are
relevant to this motion.
|
3. In this Act,
"personal information" means information about
an identifiable individual that is recorded in any form including, without
restricting the generality of the foregoing,
(a) information relating to the race, national or ethnic
origin, colour, religion, age or marital status of the individual,
(b) information relating to the education or the medical,
criminal or employment history of the individual or information relating to
financial transactions in which the individual has been involved,
(c) any identifying number, symbol or other particular
assigned to the individual,
(d) the address, fingerprints or blood type of the
individual,
(e) the personal opinions or views of the individual except
where they are about another individual or about a proposal for a grant, an
award or a prize to be made to another individual by a government institution
or a part of a government institution specified in the regulations,
(f) correspondence sent to a government institution by the
individual that is implicitly or explicitly of a private or confidential
nature, and replies to such correspondence that would reveal the contents of
the original correspondence,
(g) the views or opinions of another individual about the
individual,
(h) the views or opinions of another individual about a
proposal for a grant, an award or a prize to be made to the individual by an
institution or a part of an institution referred to in paragraph (e), but
excluding the name of the other individual where it appears with the views or
opinions of the other individual, and
(i) the name of the individual where it appears with other
personal information relating to the individual or where the disclosure of
the name itself would reveal information about the individual,
but, for the purposes of sections 7, 8 and 26 and section
19 of the Access to Information Act, does not include
(j) information about an individual who is or was an
officer or employee of a government institution that relates to the position
or functions of the individual including,
(i) the fact that the individual is or was an officer or
employee of the government institution,
(ii) the title, business address and telephone number of
the individual,
(iii) the classification, salary range and
responsibilities of the position held by the individual,
(iv) the name of the individual on a document prepared by
the individual in the course of employment, and
(v) the personal opinions or views of the individual given
in the course of employment,
(k) information about an individual who is or was
performing services under contract for a government institution that relates
to the services performed, including the terms of the contract, the name of
the individual and the opinions or views of the individual given in the
course of the performance of those services,
(l) information relating to any discretionary benefit of a
financial nature, including the granting of a licence or permit, conferred on
an individual, including the name of the individual and the exact nature of
the benefit, and
(m) information about an individual who has been dead for
more than twenty years.
|
3. Les définitions qui suivent
s’appliquent à la présente loi.
«renseignements personnels » Les renseignements,
quels que soient leur forme et leur support, concernant un individu
identifiable, notamment:
a) les renseignements relatifs à sa race,
à son origine nationale ou ethnique, à sa couleur, à sa religion, à son âge
ou à sa situation de famille;
b) les renseignements relatifs à son
éducation, à son dossier médical, à son casier judiciaire, à ses antécédents
professionnels ou à des opérations financières auxquelles il a participé;
c) tout numéro ou symbole, ou toute autre
indication identificatrice, qui lui est propre;
d) son adresse, ses empreintes digitales
ou son groupe sanguin;
e) ses opinions ou ses idées
personnelles, à l’exclusion de celles qui portent sur un autre individu ou
sur une proposition de subvention, de récompense ou de prix à octroyer à un
autre individu par une institution fédérale, ou subdivision de celle-ci visée
par règlement;
f) toute correspondance de nature,
implicitement ou explicitement, privée ou confidentielle envoyée par lui à
une institution fédérale, ainsi que les réponses de l’institution dans la
mesure où elles révèlent le contenu de la correspondance de l’expéditeur;
g) les idées ou opinions d’autrui sur lui;
h) les idées ou opinions d’un autre
individu qui portent sur une proposition de subvention, de récompense ou de
prix à lui octroyer par une institution, ou subdivision de celle-ci, visée à
l’alinéa e), à l’exclusion du nom de cet autre individu si ce nom est
mentionné avec les idées ou opinions;
i) son nom lorsque celui-ci est mentionné
avec d’autres renseignements personnels le concernant ou lorsque la seule
divulgation du nom révélerait des renseignements à son sujet;
toutefois, il demeure entendu que, pour
l’application des articles 7, 8 et 26, et de l’article 19 de la Loi sur
l’accès à l’information, les renseignements personnels ne comprennent pas les
renseignements concernant:
j) un cadre ou employé, actuel ou ancien,
d’une institution fédérale et portant sur son poste ou ses fonctions,
notamment:
(i) le fait même qu’il est ou a été
employé par l’institution,
(ii) son titre et les adresse et numéro
de téléphone de son lieu de travail,
(iii) la classification, l’éventail des
salaires et les attributions de son poste,
(iv) son nom lorsque celui-ci figure sur
un document qu’il a établi au cours de son emploi,
(v) les idées et opinions personnelles qu’il
a exprimées au cours de son emploi;
k) un individu qui, au titre d’un
contrat, assure ou a assuré la prestation de services à une institution
fédérale et portant sur la nature de la prestation, notamment les conditions
du contrat, le nom de l’individu ainsi que les idées et opinions personnelles
qu’il a exprimées au cours de la prestation;
l) des avantages financiers facultatifs,
notamment la délivrance d’un permis ou d’une licence accordés à un individu,
y compris le nom de celui-ci et la nature précise de ces avantages;
m) un individu décédé depuis plus de
vingt ans.
|
|
8.(1) Personal information under the
control of a government institution shall not, without the consent of the
individual to whom it relates, be disclosed by the institution except in
accordance with this section.
8.(2) Subject
to any other Act of Parliament, personal information under the control of a
government institution may be disclosed
. . .
(b) for any
purpose in accordance with any Act of Parliament or any regulation made
thereunder that authorizes its disclosure;
. . .
(d) to the
Attorney General of Canada for use in legal proceedings involving the Crown
in right of Canada or the Government of Canada;
|
8.(1) Les renseignements personnels qui relèvent d’une
institution fédérale ne peuvent être communiqués, à défaut du consentement de
l’individu qu’ils concernent, que conformément au présent article.
8.(2)
Sous réserve d’autres lois fédérales, la communication des renseignements
personnels qui relèvent d’une institution fédérale est autorisée dans les cas
suivants:
. .
.
b)
communication aux fins qui sont conformes avec les lois fédérales ou ceux de
leurs règlements qui autorisent cette communication;
. .
.
d)
communication au procureur général du Canada pour usage dans des poursuites
judiciaires intéressant la Couronne du chef du Canada ou le gouvernement
fédéral;
|
The
following provisions of the Federal Courts Rules, S.O.R./98-106, as
amended, are relevant to this motion.
|
204. A defendant shall defend an action by serving and
filing a statement of defence within
(a) 30 days after service of the statement of claim, if
the defendant is served in Canada;
(b) 40 days after service of the statement of claim, if
the defendant is served in the United States; and
(c) 60 days after service of the statement of claim, if
the defendant is served outside Canada and the United States.
223.(1) Every party shall serve an affidavit of documents
on every other party within 30 days after the close of pleadings.
(2) An affidavit of documents shall be in Form 223 and
shall contain
(a) separate lists and descriptions of all relevant
documents that
(i) are in the possession, power or control of the party
and for which no privilege is claimed,
(ii) are or were in the possession, power or control of
the party and for which privilege is claimed,
(iii) were but are no longer in the possession, power or
control of the party and for which no privilege is claimed, and
(iv) the party believes are in the possession, power or
control of a person who is not a party to the action;
(b) a statement of the grounds for each claim of privilege
in respect of a document;
(c) a description of how the party lost possession, power
or control of any document and its current location, as far as the party can
determine;
(d) the identity of each person referred to in
subparagraph (a)(iv), including the person's name and address, if known;
(e) a statement that the party is not aware of any
relevant document, other than those that are listed in the affidavit or are
or were in the possession, power or control of another party to the action;
and
(f) an indication of the time and place at which the
documents referred to in subparagraph (a)(i) may be inspected.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2), a document shall
be considered to be within a party's power or control if
(a) the party is entitled to obtain the original document
or a copy of it; and
(b) no adverse party is so entitled.
(4) A party may treat a bundle of documents as a single
document for the purposes of an affidavit of documents if
(a) the documents are all of the same nature; and
(b) the bundle is described in sufficient detail to enable
another party to clearly ascertain its contents.
236.(1) Subject to subsection (2), a party may examine an
adverse party for discovery only if
(a) the pleadings are closed and the examining party has
served its affidavit of documents;
(b) the pleadings are closed and the adverse party
consents to the examination being conducted before the examining party has
served its affidavit of documents; or
(c) the adverse party is in default of serving and filing
its pleadings and leave of the Court has been obtained.
(2) Subject to subsection (3), a defendant may examine a
plaintiff at any time after the statement of claim is filed.
(3) Where two or more defendants are represented by the
same solicitor, none of them may examine the plaintiff before filing a
defence unless all of them examine the plaintiff at the same time.
|
204. Le défendeur conteste l’action en
signifiant et en déposant sa défense:
a) dans les 30 jours après avoir reçu
signification de la déclaration, si cette signification a été faite au
Canada;
b) dans les 40 jours après avoir reçu
signification de la déclaration, si cette signification a été faite aux
États-Unis;
c) dans les 60 jours après avoir reçu
signification de la déclaration, si cette signification a été faite à
l’extérieur du Canada et des États-Unis.
223.(1) Chaque partie signifie un
affidavit de documents aux autres parties dans les 30 jours suivant la
clôture des actes de procédure.
(2) L’affidavit de documents est établi
selon la formule 223 et contient:
a) des listes séparées et des
descriptions de tous les documents pertinents:
(i) qui sont en la possession, sous
l’autorité ou sous la garde de la partie et à l’égard desquels aucun
privilège de non-divulgation n’est revendiqué,
(ii) qui sont ou étaient en la
possession, sous l’autorité ou sous la garde de la partie et à l’égard
desquels un privilège de non-divulgation est revendiqué,
(iii) qui étaient mais ne sont plus en la
possession, sous l’autorité ou sous la garde de la partie et à l’égard desquels
aucun privilège de non-divulgation n’est revendiqué,
(iv) que la partie croit être en la
possession, sous l’autorité ou sous la garde d’une personne qui n’est pas
partie à l’action;
b) un exposé des motifs de chaque
revendication de privilège de non-divulgation à l’égard d’un document;
c) un énoncé expliquant comment un
document a cessé d’être en la possession, sous l’autorité ou sous la garde de
la partie et indiquant où le document se trouve actuellement, dans la mesure
où il lui est possible de le déterminer;
d) les renseignements permettant
d’identifier toute personne visée au sous-alinéa a)(iv), y compris ses nom et
adresse s’ils sont connus;
e) une déclaration attestant que la
partie n’a pas connaissance de l’existence de documents pertinents autres que
ceux qui sont énumérés dans l’affidavit ou ceux qui sont ou étaient en la
possession, sous l’autorité ou sous la garde d’une autre partie à l’action;
f) une mention précisant les dates,
heures et lieux où les documents visés au sous-alinéa a)(i) peuvent être
examinés.
(3) Pour l’application du paragraphe (2),
un document est considéré comme étant sous l’autorité ou sous la garde d’une
partie si:
a) d’une part, celle-ci a le droit d’en
obtenir l’original ou une copie;
b) d’autre part, aucune partie adverse ne
jouit de ce droit.
(4) Aux fins de l’établissement de
l’affidavit de documents, une partie peut répertorier une liasse de documents
comme un seul document si:
a) d’une part, les documents sont tous de
même nature;
b) d’autre part, la description de la liasse
est suffisamment détaillée pour qu’une autre partie puisse avoir une idée
juste de son contenu.
236.(1) Sous réserve du paragraphe (2),
une partie ne peut interroger au préalable une partie adverse que si, selon
le cas:
a) les actes de procédure sont clos et la
partie qui interroge a signifié son affidavit de documents;
b) les actes de procédure sont clos et la
partie adverse consent à ce que l’interrogatoire préalable soit tenu avant
que la partie qui interroge ait signifié son affidavit de documents;
c) la partie adverse n’a signifié ni
déposé aucun acte de procédure et la Cour a donné son autorisation.
(2) Sous réserve du paragraphe (3), un
défendeur peut interroger le demandeur à tout moment après le dépôt de la déclaration.
(3) Lorsque deux ou plusieurs défendeurs
sont représentés par le même avocat, aucun d’eux ne peut interroger le
demandeur avant d’avoir déposé une défense, à moins qu’ils n’interrogent le
demandeur tous en même temps.
|
Email this Content