Date: 20110307
Docket: T-26-10
Citation: 2011
FC 267
Toronto, Ontario, March 7, 2011
PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Hughes
BETWEEN:
|
PUBLIC MOBILE INC.
|
|
|
Applicant
|
and
|
|
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA,
GLOBALIVE WIRELESS MANAGEMENT CORP.,
BELL CANADA, ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC., SHAW COMMUNICATIONS INC., AND TELUS
COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
|
|
|
Respondents
|
|
and
|
|
|
ALLIANCE OF CANADIAN CINEMA, TELEVISION AND
RADIO ARTISTS, COMMUNICATIONS, ENERGY AND PAPERWORKERS UNION OF CANADA, AND FRIENDS OF CANADIAN BROADCASTING
|
Interveners
|
REASONS
FOR ORDER AND ORDER AS TO COSTS
[1]
In my
Reasons released February 4, 2011 (2011 FC 130) I invited the parties to make
submissions as to costs. I have now received those submissions.
[2]
The
Respondent, Telus Communications Company, submitted that it would bear its own
costs; therefore no costs will be awarded for or against Telus.
[3]
Counsel
for the Applicant, Public Mobile Inc., by an e-mail to the Court sent February
25, 2011, advised that the Applicant, Public Mobile Inc., the Respondents,
Attorney General of Canada and Globalive Wireless Management Corp. have agreed that the
Applicant, Public Mobile Inc. should recover its costs from the Attorney
General of Canada and Globalive Wireless Management Corp. on a scale being the
high end of Column IV, including a second counsel fee, and that quantification
should be deferred until the disposition of all appeals. I agree with this
submission and will make an Order to that effect.
ORDER
THEREFORE, THIS COURT ORDERS
that further to the Judgment dated February 4, 2011 herein:
1.
No costs
shall be awarded for or against the Respondent, Telus Communications Company;
2.
The
Applicant, Public Mobile Inc. is entitled to recover costs, including
disbursements, from the Respondents, the Attorney General of Canada and Globalive Wireless
Management Corp. to be assessed at the high end of Column IV. The
quantification of such costs, if then required, shall be deferred until after
the final disposition of all appeals.
“Roger T. Hughes”
FEDERAL COURT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: T-26-10
STYLE
OF CAUSE: PUBLIC MOBILE INC. v. ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF
CANADA, GLOBALIVE WIRELESS
MANAGEMENT
CORP., BELL CANADA,
ROGERS
COMMUNICATIONS INC., SHAW
COMMUNICATIONS
INC., AND TELUS
COMMUNICATIONS
COMPANY v. ALLIANCE
OF
CANADIAN CINEMA, TELEVISION AND
RADIO
ARTISTS, COMMUNICATIONS, ENERGY AND PAPERWORKERS UNION OF CANADA, AND FRIENDS OF CANADIAN BROADCASTING
PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa,
Ontario
DATES OF HEARING: January
19 & 20, 2011
REASONS FOR ORDER
AND
ORDER AS TO COSTS BY: HUGHES J.
DATED: March 7, 2011
APPEARANCES:
John B. Laskin
Torys LLP, Toronto, ON
Michael H. Ryan
Arnold & Porter LLP
London, England
|
FOR THE APPLICANT
|
Robert MacKinnon
Alexander Gay
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT (Attorney
General of Canada)
|
Thomas G. Heintzman QC
Malcolm M. Mercer
Anna Matas
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
(Globalive Wireless
Management Corp.)
|
Kenneth Jull
Stephen Schmidt
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT (Telus
Communications Company)
|
Steven Shrybman
|
FOR THE INTERVENERS
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Dougald
E. Brown
Nelligan O’Brien Payne LLP
Barristers & Solicitors
Ottawa, Ontario
|
FOR THE APPLICANT
|
Myles J. Kirvan
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Ottawa, Ontario
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT (Attorney
General of Canada)
|
McCarthy Tetrault LLP
Barristers & Solicitors
Toronto, Ontario
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
(Globalive Wireless Management Corp.)
|
Stephen Schmidt
Chief Regulatory Legal Counsel
Telus Communications Company
Ottawa, Ontario
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT (Telus
Communications Company
|
Sack Goldblatt Mitchell LLP
Barristers & Solicitors
Ottawa, Ontario
|
FOR THE INTERVENERS
|