Citation: 2007TCC344
|
Date: 20070613
|
Docket: 2006-2305(GST)I
|
BETWEEN:
|
SOUTH WEST DRIVING ACADEMY LTD.,
|
Appellant,
|
and
|
|
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
|
Respondent.
|
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Little J.
A. FACTS
[1] The
Appellant is a limited company incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia.
[2] The
Appellant operated a private vocational school that provided commercial truck
driving training during the period from March 1, 2002 to November 30, 2005.
(the “Period”)
[3] The
Appellant was registered as a vocational school with Private Post Secondary
Educational Commission of British Columbia (the “PPSEC”).
[4] During
the Period, the Appellant issued certificates that made reference to PPSEC.
[5] The
Appellant was registered under Part IX of the Excise Tax Act for the
purpose of Goods and Services Tax (“GST”).
[6] The
Appellant filed its Goods and Services Tax Returns for the Period.
[7] During
the Period the Appellant did not collect any GST from its students who attended
its truck driving courses.
[8] During
the Period, the Appellant was not involved in any services of transporting
goods and passengers.
[9] During
the Period the Appellant did not make an election to opt out of exempt supplies
pursuant to the provisions of the Excise Tax Act (the “Act”).
[10] During the Period the Appellant claimed Input Tax Credits (“ITCs”) in
the amount of $11,749.93.
[11] The Minister of National Revenue (the "Minister") denied the ITCs claimed by the
Appellant.
B. ISSUE
[12] The issue is whether the Minister correctly disallowed ITCs of
$11,749.93 as claimed by the Appellant for the Period.
C. ANALYSIS and DECISION
[13] The entitlement to ITCs is provided for in subsection 169(1) of the Act.
Subsection 169(1) reads as follows:
Subject to this Part, where a person acquires or
imports property or a service or brings it into a participating province and,
during a reporting period of the person during which the person is a
registrant, tax in respect of the supply, importation or bringing in becomes
payable by the person or is paid by the person without having become payable,
the amount determined by the following formula is an input tax credit of the
person in respect of the property or service for the period:
A×B
where
A is the tax in respect of the
supply, importation or bringing in, as the case may be, that becomes payable by
the person during the reporting period or that is paid by the person during the
period without having become payable; and
B is
(a) where the tax is deemed under subsection 202(4) to have
been paid in respect of the property on the last day of a taxation year of the
person, the extent (expressed as a percentage of the total use of the property
in the course of commercial activities and businesses of the person during that
taxation year) to which the person used the property in the course of
commercial activities of the person during that taxation year,
(b) where the property or service is acquired, imported or
brought into the province, as the case may be, by the person for use in
improving capital property of the person, the extent (expressed as a
percentage) to which the person was using the capital property in the course of
commercial activities of the person immediately after the capital property or a
portion thereof was last acquired or imported by the person, and
(c) in any other case, the extent (expressed as a
percentage) to which the person acquired or imported the property or service or
brought it into the participating province, as the case may be, for consumption,
use or supply in the course of commercial activities of the person.
(Underline mine)
[14] It will be noted that the subsection provides for a formula and the
formula is A × B (see details contained in subsection 169(1)).
[15] It is important to note the reference to “commercial activities” in
paragraph (c).
[16] The phrase “commercial activity” is defined in subsection 123(1) of
the Act:
“commercial activity” of a person means
(a)
a business carried on by the person (other than a business carried on without a
reasonable expectation of profit by an individual, a personal trust or a
partnership, all of the members of which are individuals), except to the extent
to which the business involves the making of exempt supplies by the person,
(b)
an adventure or concern of the person in the nature of trade (other than an
adventure or concern engaged in without a reasonable expectation of profit by
an individual, a personal trust or a partnership, all of the members of which
are individuals), except to the extent to which the adventure or concern
involves the making of exempt supplies by the person, and
(c)
the making of a supply (other than an exempt supply) by the person of real
property of the person, including anything done by the person in the course of
or in connection with the making of the supply;
[17] The definition refers to the making of an exempt supply. The phrase “exempt
supply” is referred to in subsection 123(1) as follows:
“exempt supply” means a supply included in
Schedule V;
[18] Counsel for the Respondent argued that the Appellant was carrying on a
business making exempt supplies and there is no commercial activity when only
exempt supplies are being made.
[19] Counsel for the Respondent said “The Respondent submits that these
were exempt supplies – the training of drivers to be commercial truck drivers.
This means that what the Appellant was providing was not a commercial activity
and therefore the Appellant is not entitled to claim any input by credits”.
[20] Counsel for the Respondent also said: “A taxable supply is one that is
made in the course of a person’s commercial activity but does not include an
exempt supply. By not collecting and remitting GST on the lessons, the
Appellant is basically recognizing that they were an exempt supply”.
[21] I agree with the argument of Counsel for the Respondent and I conclude
that the Minister was correct in denying the Appellant to claim ITCs of
$11,749.93 for the Period.
[22] The appeal is dismissed without costs.
Signed at Calgary, Alberta, this 13th
day June 2007.
Little
J.