Docket: 2008-1745(GST)I
BETWEEN:
ROY DOERKSEN,
Appellant,
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
Respondent.
____________________________________________________________________
Appeal
heard on June 24-25, 2009, at Lethbridge, Alberta
Before: The Honourable
Justice D.W. Beaubier
Appearances:
|
For the Appellant:
|
The
Appellant himself
|
|
Counsel for the Respondent:
|
Valerie Meier
|
____________________________________________________________________
JUDGMENT
The appeal from the assessment made under the Excise Tax Act,
notice of which is dated August 3, 2007, is dismissed.
Signed at Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, this 8th day of July
2009.
“D.W. Beaubier”
Citation: 2009TCC350
Date: 20090708
Docket: 2008-1745(GST)I
BETWEEN:
ROY DOERKSEN,
Appellant,
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
Respondent.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Beaubier, D.J.
[1]
This appeal pursuant to
the Informal Procedure was heard at Lethbridge Alberta on
June 24, 2009. The Appellant was the only witness.
[2]
The particulars in
dispute are set out in paragraphs 2, 3, 4 and 7 of the Reply to the Motion of
Appeal. They read:
2. The Appellant filed the Rebate Application claiming a NHR in the
amount of $6,356.52 for the new home the Appellant acquired from a builder.
3. The Minister of National Revenue (the “Minister”) received the
Rebate Application, on June 22, 2007.
4. The Minister assessed, by Notice of Assessment dated August 3,
2007 (the “Assessment”), that no amount was payable to the Appellant in respect
of the NHR on the basis that the Rebate Application was received after the
expiry of the statutory claim period.
7. In so assessing the Appellant and confirming the Assessment, the
Minister made the following assumptions of fact:
(a) the Appellant purchased a single unit residential complex consisting
of a new detached home (the “House”) from Hanna Brothers Construction Ltd.
(b) the Appellant purchased the House for use as his primary place
of residence;
(c) the Appellant obtained possession/ownership of the House on
October 15, 2004;
(d) the Appellant first occupied the House on October 16, 2004;
(e) after taking possession of the house the Appellant completed the
landscaping and finished the basement, garage, patio and driveway;
(f) the tax paid in respect of the purchase of the House was no more
than $17,657.00; and
(g) the Appellant’s Rebate Application claiming a NHR in the amount
of $6,356.52 was received by the Minister on June 22, 2007.
[3]
The evidence confirmed
the Reply. In particular, the house transfer was registered in the Land Titles
office on October 12, 2004. The transfer form from the builder was signed on
October 15, 2004 and the Appellant moved into the house later in October 2004.
The Appellant’s application for the New Housing Rebate (“NHR”) was received by
Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) on June 22, 2007.
[4]
Subsection 254(3) of
the Excise Tax Act is mandatory. The NHR application must be received by
CRA within 2 years of the transfer.
[5]
That did not occur.
[6]
As a result, the Appeal
is dismissed.
Signed at Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, this 8th day of July 2009.
“D.W. Beaubier”
CITATION: 2009TCC350
COURT FILE NO.: 2008-1745(GST)I
STYLE OF CAUSE: ROY DOERKSEN AND HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
PLACE OF HEARING: Lethbridge, Alberta
DATE OF HEARING: June 24, 2009
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: The
Honourable Justice D.W. Beaubier
DATE OF JUDGMENT: July 8, 2009
APPEARANCES:
|
For the
Appellant:
|
The Appellant himself
|
|
Counsel for the
Respondent:
|
Valerie Meier
|
COUNSEL OF RECORD:
For the Appellant:
Name:
Firm:
For the
Respondent: John H. Sims, Q.C.
Deputy
Attorney General of Canada
Ottawa,
Canada
Email this Content