Docket: 2011-1030(IT)APP
BETWEEN:
JANETT JOHNSON,
Applicant,
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
Respondent.
____________________________________________________________________
Application
heard on July 7, 2011, at Toronto,
Ontario
Before: The Honourable
Justice Wyman W. Webb
Appearances:
|
Agent for the Applicant:
|
Courney
Johnson
|
|
Counsel for the Respondent:
|
Alisa Apostle
Jose Rodrigues
|
____________________________________________________________________
ORDER
The application by the Applicant for an
extension of the time within which a notice of objection in relation to the reassessment
made under the Income Tax Act for the Applicant’s 2007 taxation year may
be served is dismissed, without costs.
Signed at Vancouver, British Columbia, this 25th day of August, 2011.
“Wyman W. Webb”
Citation: 2011TCC401
Date: 20110825
Docket: 2011-1030(IT)I
BETWEEN:
JANETT JOHNSON,
Applicant,
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
Respondent.
REASONS FOR ORDER
Webb, J.
[1]
The Applicant was
reassessed on July 23, 2009 to deny amounts claimed as charitable donations in
2006 and 2007. The amounts claimed were based on the following receipts issued
in 2006:
|
Organization
|
Amount
|
|
International Charity Association Network
|
$6,036.13
|
|
The Millennium Charitable Foundation
|
$1,000.00
|
|
Total:
|
$7,036.13
|
[2]
The Applicant claimed
approximately 54% of this amount in her tax return for 2006 and the balance in
her tax return for 2007. The amounts claimed for 2006 and 2007 were denied.
[3]
The Applicant filed a
Notice of Objection on August 20, 2009. The taxation year was identified as
2006. The Notice of Objection also identified the following:
Gift-in-kind Donation Amount: $6,036.00
Cash Donation Amount: $1,000.00
[4]
The Minister notified
the Applicant by letter dated January 22, 2010 that the Notice of Objection
that the Applicant had served was only for the 2006 taxation year and since the
2007 taxation year had also been reassessed, that a separate Notice of
Objection would be required in relation to the reassessment for 2007.
[5]
On February 15, 2011
(which is more than one year after the date of the letter from the Minister
referred to above) the Applicant filed with the Minister an application for an
extension of time to serve a Notice of Objection in relation to the
reassessment of her tax liability for 2007. This application was not granted because
it was not made within one year from the expiration of the time period within
which a Notice of Objection to the reassessment issued on July 23, 2009 could
have been served. The Applicant then applied to this Court to have the
application granted.
[6]
Section 166.2 of the Income
Tax Act (the “Act”) provides in part as follows:
166.2 (1) A taxpayer who has made an application under subsection
166.1[(1)] may apply to the Tax Court of Canada to have the application granted
after either
(a) the Minister has refused the application, or
(b) 90 days have elapsed after service of the application
under subsection 166.1(1) and the Minister has not notified the taxpayer of the
Minister's decision,
but no application under this section may be made after the
expiration of 90 days after the day on which notification of the decision was
mailed to the taxpayer.
…
(5) No application shall be granted under this section unless
(a) the application was made under subsection 166.1(1) within
one year after the expiration of the time otherwise limited by this Act for
serving a notice of objection or making a request, as the case may be; and …
[7]
The application under
subsection 166.1(1) of the Act (which is referred to in paragraph
166.2(5)(a) above) is the application to the Minister to extend the time to
serve a notice of objection. The time within which a notice of objection may be
served (without an extension of time) is set out in subsection 165(1) of the Act.
This subsection provides in part as follows:
165. (1) A taxpayer who objects to an assessment under this Part
may serve on the Minister a notice of objection, in writing, setting out the
reasons for the objection and all relevant facts,
(a) where the assessment is in respect of the taxpayer for a
taxation year and the taxpayer is an individual …, on or before the later of
(i) the day that is one year after the taxpayer's filing-due date
for the year, and
(ii) the day that is 90 days after the day of mailing of the notice
of assessment; and
(b) in any other case, on or before the day that is 90 days
after the day of mailing of the notice of assessment.
[8]
Since the Applicant was
reassessed on July 23, 2009 it is clear that the application to the Minister
was not made within one year after the expiration of the time otherwise
provided for filing a notice of objection to this reassessment and therefore, as
a result of the provisions of paragraph 166.2(5)(a) of the Act,
the Applicant’s application to extend the time within which a notice of
objection may be served in relation to the reassessment of her 2007 taxation
year cannot be granted.
[9]
Whether the notice of
objection that was served on August 20, 2009 could be considered to also be an
objection to the reassessment of the Applicant’s 2007 taxation year since it
referred to the total charitable donations claimed in 2006 and 2007, was not
the issue before me. The only issue before me is the application by the
Applicant for an extension of time within which a notice of objection may be
served in relation to the reassessment of her tax liability for 2007.
[10]
The application by the
Applicant for an extension of the time within which a notice of objection may
be served in relation to the reassessment issued under the Act for the Applicant’s
2007 taxation year is dismissed, without costs.
Signed at Vancouver, British Columbia, this 25th day of August 2011.
“Wyman W. Webb”
CITATION: 2011TCC401
COURT FILE NO.: 2011-1030(IT)APP
STYLE OF CAUSE: JANETT JOHNSON AND
HER
MAJESTY THE QUEEN
PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto,
Ontario
DATE OF HEARING: July 7, 2011
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: The
Honourable Justice Wyman W. Webb
DATE OF JUDGMENT: August 25, 2011
APPEARANCES:
|
Agent for the
Applicant:
|
Courney Johnson
|
|
Counsel for the
Respondent:
|
Alisa Apostle
Jose Rodrigues
|
COUNSEL OF RECORD:
For the Appellant:
Name:
Firm:
For the
Respondent: Myles J. Kirvan
Deputy
Attorney General of Canada
Ottawa,
Canada
Email this Content