Search - convention

Konare was not a Convention refugee under section 96 of the Act or a person in need of protection under section 97 of the Act. ...

., filing a notice of objection and/or a court appeal, or requesting any recourse under a tax convention”. ...

Generally, all means available within the legislation should be exhausted before remission relief is considered, i.e. filing a notice of objection, and/or a court appeal, or requesting any recourse under a tax convention (at p 5). [23]   Each remission request is to be considered on its own merits.   ...

In a decision dated November 1, 2011, the RPD rejected the Applicant’s claim, finding that she was neither a Convention Refugee nor a person in need of protection pursuant to sections 96 and 97 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA] [the RPD Decision]. [6]   The determinative issue before the RPD was credibility; the RPD found the Applicant’s testimony not to be credible. ...

The RAD dismissed the Applicant’s appeal of a decision of the Refugee Protection Division (RPD) and confirmed the RPD’s finding that he was neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection pursuant to sections 96 and 97 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 (IRPA). ...

Introduction [1]   This is an application for judicial review, under section 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act [IRPA], of a decision of the Refugee Appeal Division (“RAD”), dated September 19, 2017, in which the RAD upheld the decision of the Refugee Protection Division (“RPD”), dated February 24, 2017, that the Applicants are neither Convention refugees nor persons in need of protection under sections 96 and 97(1) of the IRPA (the “Decision”). [2]   For the reasons that follow, this application is granted. ...

In Siliya v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 120 at para 25 [Siliya], Justice Boswell agreed with the RAD that, “[t]he question of internal flight alternative is integral to both the definition of a Convention refugee and that of a person in need of protection.” [43]   The two-part test for an IFA established in Thirunavukkarasu reflects the principles previously established in Rasaratnam. ...

Idrizi is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.   ...

Ahmed is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection. ...

On September 5, 2018, the RPD determined that the Applicant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection, respectively pursuant to sections 96 and 97(1) of the IRPA. [2]   The Applicant is a 58-year-old woman of Mexico.   ...