Search - contravention

S’agissant de l’étranger, emportent interdiction de territoire pour manquement à la présente loi tout fait — acte ou omission — commis directement ou indirectement en contravention avec la présente loi et, s’agissant du résident permanent, le manquement à l’obligation de résidence et aux conditions imposées. […] Section 5 Perte de statut et renvoi Constat de l’interdiction de territoire Rapport d’interdiction de territoire 44. (1) S’il estime que le résident permanent ou l’étranger qui se trouve au Canada est interdit de territoire, l’agent peut établir un rapport circonstancié, qu’il transmet au ministre. ...

Subject to rule 467, a person is guilty of contempt of Court who   (a) at a hearing fails to maintain a respectful attitude, remain silent or refrain from showing approval or disapproval of the proceeding;     (b) disobeys a process or order of the Court;   (c) acts in such a way as to interfere with the orderly administration of justice, or to impair the authority or dignity of the Court;   (d) is an officer of the Court and fails to perform his or her duty; or   (e) is a sheriff or bailiff and does not execute a writ forthwith or does not make a return thereof or, in executing it, infringes a rule the contravention of which renders the sheriff or bailiff liable to a penalty.   ...

Third, he stated that the request was an attempt to circumvent the normal objection and appeals process, in contravention of paragraph 73 of the Information Circular. [48]            As Justice Sharlow stated in Lanno v Canada (Customs and Revenue Agency), 2005 FCA 153 at para 2, subsection 152(4.2) of the Act is “part of a statutory scheme, referred to as the ‘fairness provisions’ or the ‘fairness package’, that gives the tax authorities the discretion to grant relief against the operation of certain provisions of the Income Tax Act ”. [49]            Subsection 152(4.2) of the Act authorizes the Minister to exercise his or her discretion to offer relief to a taxpayer beyond the strict timelines for reassessment. ...

“crime against humanity” « crime contre l’humanité » « crime contre l’humanité » “ crime against humanity ” “crime against humanity” means murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, imprisonment, torture, sexual violence, persecution or any other inhumane act or omission that is committed against any civilian population or any identifiable group and that, at the time and in the place of its commission, constitutes a crime against humanity according to customary international law or conventional international law or by virtue of its being criminal according to the general principles of law recognized by the community of nations, whether or not it constitutes a contravention of the law in force at the time and in the place of its commission. « crime contre l’humanité » Meurtre, extermination, réduction en esclavage, déportation, emprisonnement, torture, violence sexuelle, persécution ou autre fait — acte ou omission — inhumain, d’une part, commis contre une population civile ou un groupe identifiable de personnes et, d’autre part, qui constitue, au moment et au lieu de la perpétration, un crime contre l’humanité selon le droit international coutumier ou le droit international conventionnel, ou en raison de son caractère criminel d’après les principes généraux de droit reconnus par l’ensemble des nations, qu’il constitue ou non une transgression du droit en vigueur à ce moment et dans ce lieu. [18]            It is well established that the Minister is responsible for proving that there are serious reasons for considering that the claimant has committed a crime against humanity (Sivakumar v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1994] 1 FC 433 at paragraph 18). ...

Barristers and Solicitors North York, Ontario   For The ApplicantS   Deputy Attorney General of Canada Toronto, Ontario   For The Respondent     Annex A – Relevant Provisions [1]   Permanent residents must comply with a residency requirement, with respect to every five-year period, that may be fulfilled by, among other things, being physically present in Canada or by being employed outside Canada on a full-time basis by a Canadian business: IRPA s 28. 28 (1) A permanent resident must comply with a residency obligation with respect to every five-year period. 28 (1) L’obligation de résidence est applicable à chaque période quinquennale. (2) The following provisions govern the residency obligation under subsection (1): (2) Les dispositions suivantes régissent l’obligation de résidence: (a) a permanent resident complies with the residency obligation with respect to a five-year period if, on each of a total of at least 730 days in that five-year period, they are a) le résident permanent se conforme à l’obligation dès lors que, pour au moins 730 jours pendant une période quinquennale, selon le cas: (i) physically present in Canada, (i) il est effectivement présent au Canada, (ii) outside Canada accompanying a Canadian citizen who is their spouse or common-law partner or, in the case of a child, their parent, (ii) il accompagne, hors du Canada, un citoyen canadien qui est son époux ou conjoint de fait ou, dans le cas d’un enfant, l’un de ses parents, (iii) outside Canada employed on a full-time basis by a Canadian business or in the federal public administration or the public service of a province, (iii) il travaille, hors du Canada, à temps plein pour une entreprise canadienne ou pour l’administration publique fédérale ou provinciale, (iv) outside Canada accompanying a permanent resident who is their spouse or common-law partner or, in the case of a child, their parent and who is employed on a full-time basis by a Canadian business or in the federal public administration or the public service of a province, or (iv) il accompagne, hors du Canada, un résident permanent qui est son époux ou conjoint de fait ou, dans le cas d’un enfant, l’un de ses parents, et qui travaille à temps plein pour une entreprise canadienne ou pour l’administration publique fédérale ou provinciale, (v) referred to in regulations providing for other means of compliance; (v) il se conforme au mode d’exécution prévu par règlement; [2]   Failure to meet the residency requirement may lead to inadmissibility and a loss of status: IRPA ss 41(b), 46(1)(b). 41 A person is inadmissible for failing to comply with this Act 41 S’agissant de l’étranger, emportent interdiction de territoire pour manquement à la présente loi tout fait — acte ou omission — commis directement ou indirectement en contravention avec la présente loi et, s’agissant du résident permanent, le manquement à l’obligation de résidence et aux conditions imposées. ...

The Board affirmed that there was no evidence of an ongoing risk of the disclosure of taxpayer information, nor any factual basis that the Applicant knowingly disclosed taxpayer information in contravention of section 241 of the ITA (Lloyd v Canada Revenue Agency, 2017 FPSLREB 22 [Third Board Decision] at para 153).   ...

This doctrine, as applied in Canada, is based on the principle that the “circumstances” affecting procedural fairness take into account the promises or regular practices of administrative decision-makers, and that it will generally be unfair for them to act in contravention of representations as to procedure, or to backtrack on substantive promises without according significant procedural rights. [36] In JP Morgan, the Federal Court of Appeal stated that some matters, by themselves and without more, do not constitute an abuse of discretion, that is, they are not substantively unreasonable. ...

Notwithstanding the lack of agreement on these points, practically all authorities agree that under some circumstances in a particular case the corporation may be disregarded as an intermediate between the ultimate person or persons or corporation and the adverse party; and should be disregarded in the interest of justice in such cases as fraud, contravention of law or contract, public wrong, or to work out the equities among members of the corporation internally and involving no rights of the public or third persons. ...

. … […] 50 (1) The superintendent is authorized to issue a trapper’s cabin permit to any person named in a certificate of registration. 50 (1) Le directeur du parc est autorisé à délivrer un permis de cabane de trappeur aux personnes inscrites sur un certificat d’enregistrement. (2) An application for a trapper’s cabin permit shall (a) be made on a form supplied by the superintendent; and (b) contain the information required by the form and any additional information requested by the superintendent. (2) Pour obtenir un permis de cabane de trappeur il faut remplir le formulaire distribué à cette fin par le directeur du parc et fournir, le cas échéant, les renseignements complémentaires qu’il peut exiger. (3) No person shall erect or alter any building, cabin or structure in the Park unless he does so under and in accordance with a trapper’s cabin permit. (3) Il est interdit de construire ou de transformer un bâtiment ou une construction dans le parc, en contravention aux conditions d’un permis de cabane de trappeur. (4) The superintendent may refuse to issue a trapper’s cabin permit if the proposed trapper’s cabin is not compatible in design or size with the proposed location. (4) Le directeur du parc peut refuser de délivrer le permis de cabane de trappeur si la forme ou les dimensions de la cabane prévue sont incompatibles avec l’emplacement proposé. ... This doctrine, as applied in Canada, is based on the principle that the “circumstances” affecting procedural fairness take into account the promises or regular practices of administrative decision-makers, and that it will generally be unfair for them to act in contravention of representations as to procedure, or to backtrack on substantive promises without according significant procedural rights. [125]   Here, it is beyond dispute that, by way of his September 21, 2017 email, the Superintendent informed the Applicant that when responses were received from the involved Aboriginal groups that their positions would be shared with the Applicant and that he would then have an opportunity to respond to the views expressed. ... This was both on the basis of its initial construction without authorization and because it was within 800 metres of Pine Lake in contravention of Parks Canada policy. ...

Wasylynuk, the initiating of a formal hearing under subs. 41(1) of the RCMP Act, and an appearance before a formally appointed conduct board established pursuant to s. 43 of the RCMP Act to determine if there has been a contravention of the Code of Conduct. [51]   If a contravention is found, Cpl. ... He argued that he faces “serious potential jeopardy, including not only stoppage of his pay and allowances, but the stigma, embarrassment and humiliation of having to face and answer to serious Code of Conduct contraventions, including dismissal”. [52]   Cpl. ...