Search - contravene

Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals, 2010 FC 968, at paragraph [18] : [My underlining.] [37] On the other hand, the fact that the existence of the August 2005 decision or how it is identified contravene, among other things, rules 301 or 302 are not, in this particular case, among the circumstances in favour of striking or taking several other interlocutory measures. ...

Stanchfield had the intent to contravene the Order of Mr. Justice Gibson, as mens rea is not a required element; it is only relevant as a mitigating factor relative to the penalties to be imposed ...

The Respondent also points out that challenging two decisions in one application contravenes Rule 302, which limits applications to a single order ...

The Applicant further argues that, given the complex and lengthy nature of the proceedings before the Tax Court, this denial of the right to counsel constitutes a denial of the Applicant’s right to a fair hearing and contravenes the protections provided for in the Canadian Bill of Rights, S.C. 1960, c. 44, reprinted in R.S.C. 1985, App. ...

Non-compliance with Act Manquement à la loi 41 A person is inadmissible for failing to comply with this Act (a) in the case of a foreign national, through an act or omission which contravenes, directly or indirectly, a provision of this Act; and (b) in the case of a permanent resident, through failing to comply with subsection 27(2) or section 28. 41 S’agissant de l’étranger, emportent interdiction de territoire pour manquement à la présente loi tout fait — acte ou omission — commis directement ou indirectement en contravention avec la présente loi et, s’agissant du résident permanent, le manquement à l’obligation de résidence et aux conditions imposées. ...

These questions essentially seek production of transcripts of depositions given by certain witnesses in the course of judicial and administrative proceedings in the United States. [2]   The Plaintiffs have objected to those questions on the basis that the Defendants’ questions are not relevant, do not constitute proper follow-up and contravene the implied undertaking rule or protective orders issued in the US proceedings. [3]   The issues that require determination in respect of each category of questions are: 1) Whether the documents or information sought by the Defendants might constitute evidence of any unadmitted fact at issue in the actions, would contain information which may enable the Defendants to establish these facts, or would lead to such information enabling the Defendants to establish these facts. 2) Whether the questions constitute proper follow-up, that is, whether the questions arise from new information provided or documents delivered after the initial discovery, either through answers to undertakings or answers to questions initially objected to. 3) Whether production of the documents requested would breach any applicable protective order or any implied undertaking rule, such that the Court should decline to order the Plaintiffs to answer them. ...

On November 27, 2014, the Board held a hearing, which both parties attended. [8]   On January 19, 2015, the Board rejected Industria’s opposition against the Design Mark. [9]   The Board first recognized Natural Stones’ burden to show that its application does not contravene the provisions of the Act as alleged in the statement of opposition, and also recognized Industria’s initial evidential burden to prove the facts inherent to its pleadings. ...

Offence and punishment Infraction et peine (5) Any person who contravenes subsection (1) is guilty of an offence and liable (5) Quiconque contrevient au paragraphe (1) commet une infraction et encourt, sur déclaration de culpabilité: (a) on conviction on indictment, to a fine in the discretion of the court or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years, or to both; or a) par mise en accusation, l’amende que le tribunal estime indiquée et un emprisonnement maximal de quatorze ans, ou l’une de ces peines; (b) on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding $200,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year, or to both. b) par procédure sommaire, une amende maximale de 200 000 $ et un emprisonnement maximal d’un an, ou l’une de ces peines. ...

Considerations Considérations   (3) An adjudicator, when rendering the decision, must consider whether the decision that is the subject of the appeal contravenes the principles of procedural fairness, is based on an error of law or is clearly unreasonable. (3) Lorsqu’il rend la décision, l’arbitre évalue si la décision qui fait l’objet de l’appel contrevient aux principes d’équité procédurale, est entachée d’une erreur de droit ou est manifestement déraisonnable. ...

An executor who contravenes this section by a premature distribution incurs personal liability to the extent of all duties unpaid. ...