Search - contravene

That subsection creates the obligation to report the importation or exportation of currency or monetary instruments of a value equal to or greater than the prescribed amount. [13]            Put another way, an individual who contravenes subsection 12(1) may, under section 25, request a ministerial review. ...

Therefore, the relief sought would not contravene any tax policy objective ...

Every person who contravenes section 12  , 13  , 15   or 16  , subsection 20(1)  , section 31   or 40  , subsection 43(2)  , 95(1)   or (3)  , 103(3)   or 107(1)   or section 153  , 155   or 156   or commits an offence under section 159 or 159.1   (a)  is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction and liable to a fine of not more than fifty thousand dollars or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to both that fine and that imprisonment; or   (b)  is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a fine of not more than five hundred thousand dollars or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years or to both that fine and that imprisonment.                                                                     . . .   ...

I agree only insofar as the Minister suggests that a decision not to import must be expressed to the border services officer and that it is no defence for a traveller to argue that he or she did not intend to contravene the reporting requirement or had no knowledge they were in contravention. ...

I conclude that the plaintiff’s failure to do so did, as found by the Minister’s delegate, contravene the Customs Act. ...

The Foundation, as a public foundation within the meaning ascribed by the Act, is a qualified donee and subject to these provisions (see definition of “qualified donee” and “public foundation” in subsection 149.1(1), and “registered charity” in subsection 248(1) of the Act). [34]   The relevant parts of these provisions are reproduced below. 168.(1) The Minister may, by registered mail, give notice to a person described in any of paragraphs (a) to (c) of the definition qualified donee in subsection 149.1(1) that the Minister proposes to revoke its registration if the person 168.(1) Le ministre peut, par lettre recommandée, aviser une personne visée à l’un des alinéas a) à c) de la définition de donataire reconnu au paragraphe 149.1(1) de son intention de révoquer l’enregistrement si la personne, selon le cas: … […] (e) fails to comply with or contravenes any of sections 230 to 231.5; or e) omet de se conformer à l’un des articles 230 à 231.5 ou y contrevient; … […] 230.(2) Every qualified donee referred to in paragraphs (a) to (c) of the definition qualified donee in subsection 149.1(1) shall keep records and books of account — in the case of a qualified donee referred to in any of subparagraphs (a)(i) and (iii) and paragraphs (b) and (c) of that definition, at an address in Canada recorded with the Minister or designated by the Minister — containing 230.(2) Chaque donataire reconnu visé aux alinéas a) à c) de la définition de donataire reconnu au paragraphe 149.1(1) doit tenir des registres et des livres de comptes — à une adresse au Canada enregistrée auprès du ministre ou désignée par lui, s’il s’agit d’un donataire reconnu visé aux sous-alinéas a)(i) ou (iii) ou aux alinéas b) ou c) de cette définition — qui contiennent ce qui suit: (a) information in such form as will enable the Minister to determine whether there are any grounds for the revocation of its registration under this Act; a) des renseignements sous une forme qui permet au ministre de déterminer s’il existe des motifs de révocation de l’enregistrement de l’organisme ou de l’association en vertu de la présente loi; … […] [35]   The Minister focussed principally on the records relating to the consulting fees paid to Mr. ...

Filing documents without an affidavit contravenes Rule 309(2). More substantively, these documents meet none of the exceptions to the rule that judicial review is a review of what was before the tribunal below, and nothing else, discussed in Association of Universities at para 20 and set out at paragraph 47 above. ...

The Applicant says that his section 7 rights were breached because the process adopted by the PBC led to arbitrary detention, contrary to the principles of fundamental justice. [66]   The Applicant put forth a number of reasons to support his theory that the scheduling process was arbitrary, including that:- the PBC does not take notice of release dates that occur before the expiry of the 90 days within which it has to decide;- the PBC’s goal of processing decisions within the legislative time frame was an abuse of process because the Applicant agreed with the A4D recommendation and, in the alternative, consented to revocation of his statutory release but the PBC made no effort to avoid overholding him thereby paying no attention to his liberty interest;- the PBC practice for scheduling hearings exploits the 90 day window provided by subsection 163(3), which is unfair and uncaring and would shock the conscience of properly informed, dispassionate members of the community;- the PBC practice also contravenes the community’s basic sense of decency and fair play, which calls into question the integrity of the parole system and the criminal justice system as a whole. [67]   The Applicant submits that by indicating that he would not contest the CSC recommendation, the PBC had before it what amounted to a “joint consent” from the CSC and the Applicant. ...

Non-compliance with Act   Manquement à la loi 41 A person is inadmissible for failing to comply with this Act (a) in the case of a foreign national, through an act or omission which contravenes, directly or indirectly, a provision of this Act; and (b) in the case of a permanent resident, through failing to comply with subsection 27(2) or section 28.   41 S’agissant de l’étranger, emportent interdiction de territoire pour manquement à la présente loi tout fait — acte ou omission — commis directement ou indirectement en contravention avec la présente loi et, s’agissant du résident permanent, le manquement à l’obligation de résidence et aux conditions imposées.   ...

Allowing the appellant’s claim would be inconsistent with the purpose intended by the framers of the Constitution and, in the absence of any agreement with the federal and provincial governments, would amount to creating an enclave or statute-free zone on Canadian territory in which only tax measures enacted by the Montagnais would apply. [43]   Finally, it must be remembered that the duty imposed on the appellant to collect and remit taxes under the ETA does not contravene the tax exemption provided for in section 87 of the IA. ...